Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update npm package @sentry/browser to v7.119.1 [SECURITY] #5313

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

hash-worker[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Oct 4, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
@sentry/browser (source) dependencies patch 7.119.0 -> 7.119.1

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

GHSA-593m-55hh-j8gv

Impact

In case a Prototype Pollution vulnerability is present in a user's application or bundled libraries, the Sentry SDK could potentially serve as a gadget to exploit that vulnerability. The exploitability depends on the specific details of the underlying Prototype Pollution issue.

Note

This advisory does not indicate the presence of a Prototype Pollution within the Sentry SDK itself. Users are strongly advised to first address any Prototype Pollution vulnerabilities in their application, as they pose a more critical security risk.

Patches

The issue was patched in all Sentry JavaScript SDKs starting from the 8.33.0 version.
Also, the fix was backported to SDK v7 in 7.119.1.

References


Release Notes

getsentry/sentry-javascript (@​sentry/browser)

v7.119.1

Compare Source

  • fix(browser/v7): Ensure wrap() only returns functions (#​13838 backport)

Work in this release contributed by @​legobeat. Thank you for your contribution!


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge October 4, 2024 17:12
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team area/apps labels Oct 4, 2024
@hash-worker hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 561 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.831 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$51.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 558 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.719 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$44.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 395 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.095 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$68.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.525 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$60.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 618 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.099 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$41.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.188 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$95.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 723 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.608 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$91.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 988 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.379 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$80.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 807 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.959 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 628 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.335 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 505 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$42.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 460 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 209 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.457 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 244 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-30.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 210 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.548 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.815 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.501 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.370 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.733 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$1.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.51 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.26 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.223 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.514 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$1.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.48 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.199 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$4.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.98 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.757 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 10 entities $$51.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 220 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$70.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 416 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$25.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 210 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.344 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$1.52 \mathrm{s} \pm 4.59 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}455 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.003 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$12.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}39.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$1.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.76 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.491 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.82 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.826 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Merged via the queue into main with commit 58c408a Oct 4, 2024
159 checks passed
@hash-worker hash-worker bot deleted the deps/js/npm-sentry-browser-vulnerability branch October 4, 2024 17:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/apps area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant