Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_mssql_elasticpool - Fix for creating hyperscale elastic pool of type MOPRMS and PRMS #28453

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mkohn
Copy link

@mkohn mkohn commented Jan 8, 2025

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

This PR adds the ability to leverage Memory Optimized Premium

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

    module.hyperscale1.azurerm_mssql_elasticpool.sql will be updated in-place

    ~ resource "azurerm_mssql_elasticpool" "sql" {
    id = "/subscriptions/xxxxxxxxx/resourceGroups/xxxxx-xxxx-xxxx/providers/Microsoft.Sql/servers/xxxxxxx/elasticPools/xxxx-xxx-xxxx-Prm1"
    name = "xxxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-Prm1"
    # (8 unchanged attributes hidden)

    ~ sku {
        ~ family   = "PRMS" -> "MOPRMS"
        ~ name     = "HS_PRMS" -> "HS_MOPRMS"
          # (2 unchanged attributes hidden)
      }
    
      # (1 unchanged block hidden)
    

    }

Apply complete! Resources: 0 added, 1 changed, 0 destroyed.

For state migrations please test the changes locally and provide details here, such as the versions involved in testing the migration path. For further details on testing state migration changes please see our guide on state migrations in the contributor documentation. -->

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_mssql_elasticpool - adding support for the Sku MOPRMS and PRMS

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #27908

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

@mkohn mkohn requested a review from a team as a code owner January 8, 2025 18:25
@github-actions github-actions bot added bug service/mssql Microsoft SQL Server size/M labels Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug service/mssql Microsoft SQL Server size/M
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

azurerm_mssql_elasticpool - Unable to create hyperscale epool
1 participant