Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes uninitialized constant Rack::Timeout::Error #5

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jeffcarbs
Copy link

In an application where I'm using this gem, I'm also using the
rack-timeout gem (https://github.com/kch/rack-timeout), so use of
Timeout inside the Rack::OpenID class was finding Rack::Timeout,
which is not the same. This commit updates references to Timeout to
use the root namespace (::Timeout).

In an application where I'm using this gem, I'm also using the
rack-timeout gem (https://github.com/kch/rack-timeout), so use of
Timeout inside the Rack::OpenID class was finding Rack::Timeout,
which is not the same. This commit updates references to Timeout to
use the root namespace (::Timeout).
@teliosdev
Copy link

👍

@brondavies
Copy link

When is this going to get merged?

@kirley
Copy link

kirley commented Sep 22, 2014

Any update on when this might be merged?

simeonwillbanks pushed a commit to stitchfix/rack-openid that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2014
grosser#5

In an application where I'm using this gem, I'm also using the
rack-timeout gem (https://github.com/kch/rack-timeout), so use of
Timeout inside the Rack::OpenID class was finding Rack::Timeout,
which is not the same. This commit updates references to Timeout to
use the root namespace (::Timeout).

Conflicts:
	lib/rack/openid.rb
@bdarfler
Copy link

👍

Copy link

@pboling pboling left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

pboling added a commit to oauth-xx/rack-openid2 that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants