add examples

examples/dissolution_fast.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# GrainHill input file:
+#
+# dissolution_fast: runs a simulation with steady fault slip and
+# dissolution (only), with a relatively high dissolution efficiency.
+# Reproduces the run in Figure 7d in Tucker et al. (2020). 
+#
+model_type: 'facet'
+number_of_node_rows: 111
+number_of_node_columns: 81
+cell_width: 0.5
+grav_accel: 9.8
+report_interval: 5.0
+run_duration: 130000.0 
+output_interval: 1.0e99
+dissolution_rate: 4.4e-4
+disturbance_rate: 0.0
+weathering_rate: 0.0
+uplift_interval: 866.0
+plot_interval: 26000.0
+save_plots: True
+plot_filename: 'dissolve_dr44_'
+plot_filetype: '.png'
+friction_coef: 1.0
+fault_x: -0.01 
+

examples/dissolution_slow.txt

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 #
 # dissolution_slow: runs a simulation with steady fault slip and
 # dissolution (only), with a relatively low dissolution efficiency.
-# Similar to Figure 7a in Tucker et al. (2020). 
+# Reproduces the run in Figure 7a in Tucker et al. (2020). 
 #
 model_type: 'facet'
 number_of_node_rows: 111

examples/facet_high_w_high_d.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# GrainHill input file:
+#
+# facet_high_w_high_d: runs a simulation with steady fault slip, and relatively 
+# high rates of weathering and disturbance. Reproduces the run in upper right
+# corner of Figure 9 in Tucker et al. (2020). 
+#
+model_type: 'facet'
+number_of_node_rows: 111
+number_of_node_columns: 81
+cell_width: 0.5
+grav_accel: 9.8
+report_interval: 5.0
+run_duration: 130000.0 
+output_interval: 1.0e99
+dissolution_rate: 0.0
+disturbance_rate: 0.1
+weathering_rate: 0.1
+uplift_interval: 866.0
+plot_interval: 26000.0
+save_plots: True
+plot_filename: 'facet_high_w_high_d'
+plot_filetype: '.png'
+friction_coef: 1.0
+fault_x: -0.01 
+

examples/facet_high_w_low_d.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# GrainHill input file:
+#
+# facet_high_w_low_d: runs a simulation with steady fault slip, a relatively 
+# high weathering rate, and a relatively low disturbance rate. Reproduces the
+# run in upper left corner of Figure 9 in Tucker et al. (2020). 
+#
+model_type: 'facet'
+number_of_node_rows: 111
+number_of_node_columns: 81
+cell_width: 0.5
+grav_accel: 9.8
+report_interval: 5.0
+run_duration: 130000.0 
+output_interval: 1.0e99
+dissolution_rate: 0.0
+disturbance_rate: 0.0001
+weathering_rate: 0.1
+uplift_interval: 866.0
+plot_interval: 26000.0
+save_plots: True
+plot_filename: 'facet_high_w_low_d'
+plot_filetype: '.png'
+friction_coef: 1.0
+fault_x: -0.01 
+

examples/facet_low_w_high_d.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# GrainHill input file:
+#
+# facet_low_w_high_d: runs a simulation with steady fault slip, a relatively 
+# low weathering rate, and a relatively high disturbance rate. Reproduces the 
+# run in lower right corner of Figure 9 in Tucker et al. (2020). 
+#
+model_type: 'facet'
+number_of_node_rows: 111
+number_of_node_columns: 81
+cell_width: 0.5
+grav_accel: 9.8
+report_interval: 5.0
+run_duration: 130000.0 
+output_interval: 1.0e99
+dissolution_rate: 0.0
+disturbance_rate: 0.1
+weathering_rate: 0.0001
+uplift_interval: 866.0
+plot_interval: 26000.0
+save_plots: True
+plot_filename: 'facet_low_w_high_d'
+plot_filetype: '.png'
+friction_coef: 1.0
+fault_x: -0.01 
+

examples/facet_low_w_low_d.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+# GrainHill input file:
+#
+# facet_low_w_low_d: runs a simulation with steady fault slip, and relatively
+# low rates of weathering and disturbance. Reproduces the run in lower left
+# corner of Figure 9 in Tucker et al. (2020).
+#
+model_type: 'facet'
+number_of_node_rows: 111
+number_of_node_columns: 81
+cell_width: 0.5
+grav_accel: 9.8
+report_interval: 5.0
+run_duration: 130000.0
+output_interval: 1.0e99
+dissolution_rate: 0.0
+disturbance_rate: 0.0001
+weathering_rate: 0.0001
+uplift_interval: 866.0
+plot_interval: 26000.0
+save_plots: True
+plot_filename: 'facet_low_w_low_d'
+plot_filetype: '.png'
+friction_coef: 1.0
+fault_x: -0.01

examples/facet_with_wedge_blrise_high_w_high_d.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# GrainHill input file:
+#
+# facet_with_wedge_blrise_high_w_high_d: runs a simulation with steady fault
+# slip, and relatively high rates of weathering and disturbance. Fault is
+# positioned at x=23, allowing the formation of a colluvial wedge. Baselevel
+# rise is imposed at left model boundary. Reproduces the run in upper right
+# corner of Figure 13 in Tucker et al. (2020).
+#
+model_type: 'facet'
+number_of_node_rows: 111
+number_of_node_columns: 81
+cell_width: 0.5
+grav_accel: 9.8
+report_interval: 5.0
+run_duration: 130000.0
+output_interval: 1.0e99
+dissolution_rate: 0.0
+disturbance_rate: 0.1
+weathering_rate: 0.1
+uplift_interval: 866.0
+baselevel_rise_interval: 4000.0
+plot_interval: 26000.0
+save_plots: True
+plot_filename: 'facet_with_wedge_blrise_high_w_high_d'
+plot_filetype: '.png'
+friction_coef: 1.0
+fault_x: 23.0

examples/facet_with_wedge_blrise_high_w_low_d.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# GrainHill input file:
+#
+# facet_with_wedge_blrise_high_w_low_d: runs a simulation with steady fault
+# slip, a relatively high weathering rate, and a relatively low disturbance
+# rate. Fault is positioned at x=23, allowing the formation of a colluvial
+# wedge. Baselevel rise is imposed at left model boundary. Reproduces the run
+# in upper left corner of Figure 13 in Tucker et al. (2020).
+#
+model_type: 'facet'
+number_of_node_rows: 111
+number_of_node_columns: 81
+cell_width: 0.5
+grav_accel: 9.8
+report_interval: 5.0
+run_duration: 130000.0
+output_interval: 1.0e99
+dissolution_rate: 0.0
+disturbance_rate: 0.0001
+weathering_rate: 0.1
+uplift_interval: 866.0
+baselevel_rise_interval: 4000.0
+plot_interval: 26000.0
+save_plots: True
+plot_filename: 'facet_with_wedge_blrise_high_w_low_d'
+plot_filetype: '.png'
+friction_coef: 1.0
+fault_x: 23.0

examples/facet_with_wedge_blrise_low_w_high_d.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# GrainHill input file:
+#
+# facet_with_wedge_blrise_low_w_high_d: runs a simulation with steady fault
+# slip, a relatively low weathering rate, and a relatively high disturbance
+# rate. Fault is positioned at x=23, allowing the formation of a colluvial
+# wedge. Baselevel rise is imposed at left model boundary. Reproduces the run
+# in lower right corner of Figure 13 in Tucker et al. (2020).
+#
+model_type: 'facet'
+number_of_node_rows: 111
+number_of_node_columns: 81
+cell_width: 0.5
+grav_accel: 9.8
+report_interval: 5.0
+run_duration: 130000.0
+output_interval: 1.0e99
+dissolution_rate: 0.0
+disturbance_rate: 0.1
+weathering_rate: 0.0001
+uplift_interval: 866.0
+baselevel_rise_interval: 4000.0
+plot_interval: 26000.0
+save_plots: True
+plot_filename: 'facet_with_wedge_blrise_low_w_high_d'
+plot_filetype: '.png'
+friction_coef: 1.0
+fault_x: 23.0

examples/facet_with_wedge_blrise_low_w_low_d.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# GrainHill input file:
+#
+# facet_with_wedge_blrise_low_w_low_d: runs a simulation with steady fault slip,
+# and relatively low rates of weathering and disturbance. Fault is positioned at
+# x=23, allowing the formation of a colluvial wedge. Baselevel rise is imposed
+# at left model boundary. Reproduces the run in lower left corner of Figure 13
+# in Tucker et al. (2020).
+#
+model_type: 'facet'
+number_of_node_rows: 111
+number_of_node_columns: 81
+cell_width: 0.5
+grav_accel: 9.8
+report_interval: 5.0
+run_duration: 130000.0
+output_interval: 1.0e99
+dissolution_rate: 0.0
+disturbance_rate: 0.0001
+weathering_rate: 0.0001
+uplift_interval: 866.0
+baselevel_rise_interval: 4000.0
+plot_interval: 26000.0
+save_plots: True
+plot_filename: 'facet_with_wedge_blrise_low_w_low_d'
+plot_filetype: '.png'
+friction_coef: 1.0
+fault_x: 23.0

examples/facet_with_wedge_high_w_high_d.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# GrainHill input file:
+#
+# facet_with_wedge_high_w_high_d: runs a simulation with steady fault slip,
+# and relatively high rates of weathering and disturbance. Fault is positioned
+# at x=23, allowing the formation of a colluvial wedge. Reproduces the run in
+# upper right corner of Figure 12 in Tucker et al. (2020).
+#
+model_type: 'facet'
+number_of_node_rows: 111
+number_of_node_columns: 81
+cell_width: 0.5
+grav_accel: 9.8
+report_interval: 5.0
+run_duration: 130000.0
+output_interval: 1.0e99
+dissolution_rate: 0.0
+disturbance_rate: 0.1
+weathering_rate: 0.1
+uplift_interval: 866.0
+plot_interval: 26000.0
+save_plots: True
+plot_filename: 'facet_with_wedge_high_w_high_d'
+plot_filetype: '.png'
+friction_coef: 1.0
+fault_x: 23.0

examples/facet_with_wedge_high_w_low_d.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# GrainHill input file:
+#
+# facet_with_wedge_high_w_low_d: runs a simulation with steady fault slip, 
+# a relatively high weathering rate, and a relatively low disturbance rate. 
+# Fault is positioned at x=23, allowing the formation of a colluvial wedge.
+# Reproduces the run in upper left corner of Figure 12 in Tucker et al. (2020). 
+#
+model_type: 'facet'
+number_of_node_rows: 111
+number_of_node_columns: 81
+cell_width: 0.5
+grav_accel: 9.8
+report_interval: 5.0
+run_duration: 130000.0 
+output_interval: 1.0e99
+dissolution_rate: 0.0
+disturbance_rate: 0.0001
+weathering_rate: 0.1
+uplift_interval: 866.0
+plot_interval: 26000.0
+save_plots: True
+plot_filename: 'facet_with_wedge_high_w_low_d'
+plot_filetype: '.png'
+friction_coef: 1.0
+fault_x: 23.0 
+

examples/facet_with_wedge_low_w_high_d.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# GrainHill input file:
+#
+# facet_with_wedge_low_w_high_d: runs a simulation with steady fault slip, a
+# relatively low weathering rate, and a relatively high disturbance rate.
+# Fault is positioned at x=23, allowing the formation of a colluvial wedge.
+# Reproduces the run in lower right corner of Figure 12 in Tucker et al. (2020).
+#
+model_type: 'facet'
+number_of_node_rows: 111
+number_of_node_columns: 81
+cell_width: 0.5
+grav_accel: 9.8
+report_interval: 5.0
+run_duration: 130000.0
+output_interval: 1.0e99
+dissolution_rate: 0.0
+disturbance_rate: 0.1
+weathering_rate: 0.0001
+uplift_interval: 866.0
+plot_interval: 26000.0
+save_plots: True
+plot_filename: 'facet_with_wedge_low_w_high_d'
+plot_filetype: '.png'
+friction_coef: 1.0
+fault_x: 23.0

examples/facet_with_wedge_low_w_low_d.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# GrainHill input file:
+#
+# facet_with_wedge_low_w_low_d: runs a simulation with steady fault slip, and
+# relatively low rates of weathering and disturbance. Fault is positioned at
+# x=23, allowing the formation of a colluvial wedge. Reproduces the run in lower
+# left corner of Figure 12 in Tucker et al. (2020).
+#
+model_type: 'facet'
+number_of_node_rows: 111
+number_of_node_columns: 81
+cell_width: 0.5
+grav_accel: 9.8
+report_interval: 5.0
+run_duration: 130000.0
+output_interval: 1.0e99
+dissolution_rate: 0.0
+disturbance_rate: 0.0001
+weathering_rate: 0.0001
+uplift_interval: 866.0
+plot_interval: 26000.0
+save_plots: True
+plot_filename: 'facet_with_wedge_low_w_low_d'
+plot_filetype: '.png'
+friction_coef: 1.0
+fault_x: 23.0