Add: standalone plugin for deprecating VTs

[amy-gb]

What

Add a standalone plugin to deprecate VTs. The script takes either a single file or a directory of files, and writes the updated file to a new location.

The changes the script should accomplish are (from the relevant internal Confluence page):

1. add a note to the summary of why the VT is deprecated
2. remove all code after the description block
3. add the early exit (66) to the end
4. add the deprecated=True tag
5. remove unneeded script tags

Why

For the Red Hat deployment we need to deprecate hundreds of VTs. Therefore it makes sense to have a script that does this

References

VTA-531

Checklist

• Tests

[github-actions]

Conventional Commits Report

Type	Number
Added	1

🚀 Conventional commits found.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 79.31034% with 18 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.45%. Comparing base (6613c5b) to head (139fb8e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
troubadix/standalone_plugins/deprecate_vts.py	79.31%	11 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #718      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.45%   79.45%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          85       86       +1     
  Lines        2823     2910      +87     
  Branches      596      611      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits         2243     2312      +69     
- Misses        440      451      +11     
- Partials      140      147       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[cfi-gb]

Note: I have redacted an internal link from the description.

[amy-gb]

Thank you for the thorough review @mbrinkhoff! I believe I have addressed all of your comments.

[mbrinkhoff]

Thank you for the thorough review @mbrinkhoff! I believe I have addressed all of your comments.

I will take another look

His remark has been addressed