Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Update structured metadata docs #12187

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

JStickler
Copy link
Contributor

Follow up to the weekly team meeting - Adding some clarification around the use case for using structured metadata.

@JStickler JStickler added the type/docs Issues related to technical documentation; the Docs Squad uses this label across many repositories label Mar 12, 2024
@JStickler JStickler requested a review from a team as a code owner March 12, 2024 21:03
Copy link
Contributor

@stevendungan stevendungan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should replace trace_id references with something more representative either infra-specific or an Otel resource attribute

@JStickler JStickler force-pushed the 2024-03-12_structuredMetadata branch from 7d5b75b to 335fbab Compare March 18, 2024 17:46
@JStickler JStickler merged commit 4d38ff7 into main Mar 18, 2024
14 checks passed
@JStickler JStickler deleted the 2024-03-12_structuredMetadata branch March 18, 2024 18:40
grafanabot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2024
edsoncelio pushed a commit to edsoncelio/loki that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2024
rhnasc pushed a commit to inloco/loki that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport release-2.9.x size/S type/docs Issues related to technical documentation; the Docs Squad uses this label across many repositories
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants