chore: remove wire #660
chore: remove wire #660
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #660 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 70.36% 70.58% +0.21%
==========================================
Files 189 186 -3
Lines 11926 11874 -52
==========================================
- Hits 8392 8381 -11
+ Misses 2956 2923 -33
+ Partials 578 570 -8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 37
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (34)
testing/docker/database.go (1)
53-60: LGTM: Build method refactored effectively.The
Buildmethod has been successfully refactored to use the new ORM-based approach. The changes improve the build process by adding database port configuration and explicitly calling migrations.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider extracting the string
"database.connections.%s.port"into a constant for better maintainability. For example:+const databaseConnectionPortFormat = "database.connections.%s.port" func (r *Database) Build() error { if err := r.DatabaseDriver.Build(); err != nil { return err } - r.config.Add(fmt.Sprintf("database.connections.%s.port", r.connection), r.DatabaseDriver.Config().Port) + r.config.Add(fmt.Sprintf(databaseConnectionPortFormat, r.connection), r.DatabaseDriver.Config().Port) r.artisan.Call("migrate") r.orm.Refresh() return nil }database/db/dsn_test.go (2)
28-33: LGTM: Improved test structure with table-driven tests.The new
TestDsnfunction implements a table-driven test approach, which is more maintainable and allows for easy addition of new test cases. This structure effectively covers multiple database configurations in a single test function.Consider adding a comment above the
testsslice to briefly explain the purpose of these test cases, enhancing readability for future maintainers.
34-80: LGTM: Comprehensive test cases for various database configurations.The test cases cover a wide range of scenarios including empty config, MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and SQL Server. Each case is well-structured with a clear name, configuration, and expected DSN string.
Consider adding a test case for a configuration with non-default values (e.g., different charset, sslmode, or timezone) to ensure the DSN generation handles custom settings correctly.
database/service_provider.go (1)
22-29: Approve changes with a suggestion for context handling.The changes in the
Registermethod look good overall. The receiver name change toris consistent with Go conventions, and the error message update is appropriate.Consider using a more specific context instead of
context.Background(). If this is part of an HTTP request handler, you might want to use the request's context. If it's part of a longer-running process, consider passing a cancellable context from the caller.Example:
func (r *ServiceProvider) Register(app foundation.Application) { app.Singleton(BindingOrm, func(app foundation.Application) (any, error) { // Use a context with timeout or one passed from the caller ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 5*time.Second) defer cancel() // Rest of the code... }) // Rest of the method... }database/migration/schema.go (1)
77-87: LGTM! Consider addressing TODOs in future PRs.The changes to use
contractsdatabaseinstead ofcontractsormfor driver constants are consistent and maintain the function's logic. However, there are still TODO comments for MySQL, SQL Server, and SQLite drivers that should be addressed in future pull requests to improve the implementation.Consider creating issues to track the implementation of these drivers:
- MySQL driver implementation
- SQL Server driver implementation
- SQLite driver implementation
support/docker/postgres.go (1)
Line range hint
1-124: Summary of changes and potential impactThe changes in this file are part of a larger refactoring effort to move from an ORM-specific structure to a more general database structure. This aligns with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component. The changes are minimal, focused, and well-implemented.
Key points:
- The import statement has been updated to use the more general
databasepackage.- The
Driver()method has been modified to returndatabase.Driverinstead oform.Driver.These changes appear to be consistent and don't introduce any apparent issues. However, it's crucial to ensure that these modifications are consistent across the entire codebase and don't break any existing functionality that might depend on the old structure.
Consider updating the documentation to reflect these architectural changes, especially if this is part of a larger refactoring effort. This will help maintain clear and up-to-date documentation for developers working on the project.
database/console/test_utils.go (1)
Line range hint
1-116: Summary: Changes align with PR objective and maintain functionality.The modifications in this file successfully remove references to the "wire" component by updating import statements and type references from
contractsormtodatabase. These changes are consistent throughout the file and maintain the existing functionality.To ensure the completeness of this refactoring effort:
- Verify that similar changes have been made in other relevant files across the codebase.
- Update any documentation or comments that may reference the old
contractsormpackage.- Run the full test suite to confirm that these changes haven't introduced any regressions.
Consider adding a brief comment at the top of the file explaining the rationale behind using the
databasepackage instead ofcontractsorm. This will help future maintainers understand the design decision.database/migration/sql_driver.go (1)
Line range hint
1-103: Summary: Changes align with PR objective and maintain existing functionality.The changes in this file are consistent with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component. The import path change and the corresponding update to the switch statement reflect a refactoring of the package structure from
ormtodatabase. These changes maintain the existing functionality of theSqlDriverstruct and its methods while simplifying the overall package structure.To ensure a smooth transition:
- Verify that all files importing the old
ormpackage have been updated.- Confirm that the constant definitions in the new
databasepackage match the ones previously defined in theormpackage.- Run the test cases mentioned in the PR description to ensure no regressions.
Consider updating the package documentation to reflect these changes and their rationale, which will help other developers understand the new structure.
database/console/migrate_creator.go (1)
Line range hint
1-98: Summary of changes and suggestion for documentation update.The changes in this file are part of the larger effort to remove the "wire" component and refactor from an orm-specific implementation to a more general database implementation. The functionality of the
MigrateCreatorstruct and its methods remains unchanged, with only the import and switch statement being updated to use the newdatabasepackage instead oform.Consider updating any relevant documentation or comments in the codebase to reflect this change from
ormtodatabase, ensuring consistency across the project.database/migration/schema_test.go (2)
28-28: LGTM: SchemaSuite struct updated correctly.The change from
contractsorm.Drivertocontractsdatabase.Driverfor thedriverToTestDBmap is consistent with the overall update in the file. This reflects a transition from ORM-specific to more general database contracts.Consider renaming
driverToTestDBtodriverToTestDatabasefor improved clarity, given the shift from ORM to general database contracts.
55-56: Driver type updated correctly, but consider improving test coverage.The change from
contractsorm.Drivertocontractsdatabase.Driveris consistent with previous updates. However, hardcoding the connection string to "postgres" might limit the test coverage to only PostgreSQL.Consider parameterizing the connection string to allow testing with multiple database drivers. This could be achieved by iterating over the
s.driverToTestDBmap or using a test table. For example:for driver, testDB := range s.driverToTestDB { s.Run(driver.String(), func() { connection := driver.String() // ... rest of the test logic }) }This approach would ensure that the
TestConnectionmethod covers all supported database drivers.support/docker/mysql.go (1)
Line range hint
1-138: Summary: Changes align with PR objective and suggest larger refactoring effort.The modifications in this file, specifically the import statement change and the
Drivermethod update, are consistent with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component. These changes appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to simplify and consolidate database-related code in the Goravel framework.The limited scope of changes in this file suggests that the removal of the "wire" component mainly affects the database interfaces and not the implementation details of the MySQL driver. This approach maintains the existing functionality while moving towards a more abstract and flexible database interface.
To ensure the consistency and completeness of this refactoring effort across the entire codebase, consider the following actions:
- Review other database-related files for similar changes.
- Update any documentation or guides that reference the old database package structure.
- Ensure that all tests related to database functionality are updated and passing with these changes.
Would you like assistance in generating a checklist for these follow-up actions or in creating any necessary documentation updates?
foundation/container_test.go (1)
107-113: Good completion of Refresh test caseThe addition of re-binding the Singleton after refresh completes the test case effectively. It ensures that the container can properly handle re-binding after a refresh operation. The checks for existence, shared status, and non-nil concrete are thorough.
Consider adding an assertion to verify that the concrete implementation of the re-bound Singleton is as expected:
s.True(ins.shared) s.NotNil(ins.concrete) +switch concrete := ins.concrete.(type) { +case func(app foundation.Application) (any, error): + concreteImpl, err := concrete(nil) + s.Equal(1, concreteImpl) + s.Nil(err) +default: + s.Fail("Unexpected concrete type after re-binding") +}This addition would ensure that the re-bound Singleton behaves as expected.
database/gorm/event.go (1)
Line range hint
1-368: Summary: Changes align with PR objective. Suggest comprehensive testing.The modifications in this file consistently move away from the
QueryImpltype to a more genericQuerytype, aligning with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component. These changes appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort.To ensure the integrity of the framework after these changes:
- Verify that all related components have been updated to use the new
Querytype instead ofQueryImpl.- Run a comprehensive test suite to catch any potential regressions or unintended side effects.
- Consider updating any documentation or examples that may reference the old
QueryImpltype.Would you like assistance in generating a test plan or updating documentation?
contracts/database/orm/orm.go (1)
21-22: LGTM! Consider enhancing the method comment.The addition of the
Refresh()method to theOrminterface is a good improvement. It provides a way to reset the ORM instance, which can be useful in various scenarios.Consider expanding the comment to provide more context about when and why this method might be used. For example:
// Refresh resets the Orm instance, clearing any cached data or temporary state. // This can be useful after bulk operations or when switching between different database operations. Refresh()foundation/container.go (1)
334-336: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The
Refreshmethod is a good addition to theContainerstruct. It allows for the removal of cached instances, which can be useful for refreshing bindings or clearing stale data.Consider adding a comment to explain the purpose of this method, for example:
// Refresh removes the instance associated with the given key from the container, // allowing for re-creation of the instance on subsequent requests. func (c *Container) Refresh(key any) { c.instances.Delete(key) }database/migration/blueprint_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-380: Summary: Changes consistently update driver types and maintain test functionality.The modifications in this file successfully transition from
orm.Drivertodatabase.Driver, aligning with the PR objective. All changes are consistent and maintain the existing test functionality while updating to the new driver type.To ensure completeness:
- Verify that all instances of
orm.Driverhave been replaced throughout the codebase.- Consider updating the PR description to mention this specific change from
ormtodatabasepackage for driver types.- Ensure that any documentation referencing the old
orm.Driveris updated accordingly.database/gorm/query_test.go (4)
Line range hint
612-619: LGTM: Improved type safety in driver comparisonThe switch statement now uses
database.Driver*constants instead of string literals, which enhances type safety and maintainability. This is a good practice.Consider using a
switch driver.(type)statement instead of comparing the string representation. This would provide even better type safety and potentially better performance. For example:switch driver.(type) { case *database.DriverSqlserver, *database.DriverMysql: // ... default: // ... }
2047-2047: LGTM: SQLite excluded from LockForUpdate testExcluding SQLite from the LockForUpdate test is appropriate, as SQLite likely doesn't support this feature or behaves differently from other databases.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining why SQLite is excluded from this test. This would help other developers understand the reasoning behind this condition. For example:
// SQLite doesn't support FOR UPDATE locks in the same way as other databases if driver != database.DriverSqlite { // ... }
2778-2778: LGTM: SQLite excluded from SharedLock testExcluding SQLite from the SharedLock test is consistent with the approach taken in the LockForUpdate test. This ensures the test runs correctly for supported databases.
For consistency, consider adding a similar comment here as suggested for the LockForUpdate test. This maintains a uniform explanation throughout the code. For example:
// SQLite doesn't support shared locks in the same way as other databases if driver != database.DriverSqlite { // ... }
3659-3659: LGTM: Added mock config parameter to mockCommonConnectionThe addition of the
mockConfigparameter to themockCommonConnectionfunction enhances flexibility in testing by allowing the injection of a mock configuration. This is a good practice for improving testability.Consider updating the function's documentation (if it exists) to reflect this new parameter. If there's no existing documentation, it would be beneficial to add a brief comment explaining the purpose of this function and its parameters. For example:
// mockCommonConnection sets up a mock database connection for testing purposes. // It takes a mock configuration, a test query, and a connection string as parameters. func mockCommonConnection(mockConfig *mocksconfig.Config, testQuery *TestQuery, connection string) { // ... }contracts/database/config.go (1)
25-26: Improve the Comment forFullConfigStructThe comment
// FullConfig Fill the default value for Configcould be more descriptive. Consider revising it to better explain the purpose ofFullConfig.Apply this diff to enhance the comment:
-// FullConfig Fill the default value for Config +// FullConfig extends Config with additional database configuration options.database/gorm/dialector.go (2)
19-43: Handle Errors Without Halting the Entire ProcessCurrently, if an error occurs for a single configuration (e.g., empty DSN or unsupported driver), the function returns the error and halts processing. This means that valid configurations after the erroneous one are not processed.
Consider accumulating errors and processing all configurations. You could collect all successful dialectors and any errors, returning both so the caller can decide how to proceed.
16-44: Ensure Unit Test Coverage for All ScenariosTo maintain robustness, ensure that unit tests cover:
- Successful dialector creation for each supported driver.
- Handling of empty DSNs.
- Behavior when encountering an unsupported driver.
- Scenarios with multiple configurations, including both valid and invalid entries.
database/gorm/dialector_test.go (1)
25-26: Consider renamingexpectDialectorstoexpectDialectorfor clarityThe field
expectDialectorsrepresents a function that checks a single dialector. Renaming it toexpectDialector(singular) would enhance readability and accurately reflect its purpose.database/console/migrate.go (1)
Line range hint
35-53: Refactor to eliminate duplicated code across driver casesThe logic within each
caseblock of theswitchstatement is largely duplicated for each database driver. Each block performs similar steps:
- Retrieve the DSN.
- Check if the DSN is empty.
- Open a database connection.
- Handle potential errors.
- Create an instance specific to the database.
- Return the migration instance.
Consider refactoring this repeated logic into a helper function or utilizing a factory pattern to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
Also applies to: 54-72, 73-91, 92-111
database/orm.go (1)
Line range hint
58-64: Consider returning an error instead ofnilwhen connection initialization failsIn the
Connectionmethod, ifgorm.BuildQueryfails, the function prints an error message and returnsnil. Returningnilfor an interface can lead tonilpointer dereferences if the caller does not check fornil. It's advisable to return an explicit error so that callers can handle it appropriately.Apply this diff to modify the function signature and handle errors:
-func (r *Orm) Connection(name string) contractsorm.Orm { +func (r *Orm) Connection(name string) (contractsorm.Orm, error) { if name == "" { name = r.config.GetString("database.default") } if instance, exist := r.queries[name]; exist { return &Orm{ ctx: r.ctx, config: r.config, connection: name, query: instance, queries: r.queries, - } + }, nil } queue, err := gorm.BuildQuery(r.ctx, r.config, name) if err != nil || queue == nil { color.Red().Println(fmt.Sprintf("[Orm] Init %s connection error: %v", name, err)) - return nil + return nil, err } r.queries[name] = queue return &Orm{ ctx: r.ctx, config: r.config, connection: name, query: queue, queries: r.queries, - } + }, nil }database/gorm/gorm.go (1)
Line range hint
108-112: Use dynamic log level in logger configurationIn the
NewLoggerinitialization, theLogLevelis hardcoded togormlogger.Info, which overrides thelogLeveldetermined by theapp.debugsetting. This could lead to unintended logging levels in different environments. Please setLogLevelto use the dynamiclogLevelvariable to ensure consistent logging behavior.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
logger := NewLogger(log.New(os.Stdout, "\r\n", log.LstdFlags), gormlogger.Config{ SlowThreshold: 200 * time.Millisecond, - LogLevel: gormlogger.Info, + LogLevel: logLevel, IgnoreRecordNotFoundError: true, Colorful: true, })database/db/configs_test.go (1)
118-232: Enhance test coverage with additional edge casesThe
TestFillDefault()function covers several scenarios, but there may be other edge cases worth testing. Consider adding tests for:
- Configurations with missing optional fields to ensure defaults are correctly applied.
- Configurations with invalid values to verify error handling.
- Multiple configurations with mixed validity to confirm that each is processed appropriately.
Adding these tests will improve the robustness of the
fillDefault()method and ensure it behaves correctly under various conditions.database/gorm/query.go (3)
35-41: Inconsistent variable naming: 'queryImpl' vs. 'Query'In the
NewQueryfunction, the variable is namedqueryImpl, but the struct is now namedQuery. For consistency and clarity, consider renaming the variable toquery.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
func NewQuery(ctx context.Context, config config.Config, connection string, db *gormio.DB, conditions *Conditions) *Query { - queryImpl := &Query{ + query := &Query{ config: config, connection: connection, ctx: ctx, instance: db, queries: make(map[string]*Query), } if conditions != nil { - queryImpl.conditions = *conditions + query.conditions = *conditions } - return queryImpl + return query }
Line range hint
108-136: Possible data race on 'err' variable within goroutine in 'Cursor' methodIn the
Cursormethod, theerrvariable is shared between the main function and the goroutine without proper synchronization, which can lead to data races.To avoid data races, consider using a channel to pass errors from the goroutine back to the main function, or handle the error within the goroutine appropriately.
For example:
func (r *Query) Cursor() (chan contractsorm.Cursor, error) { with := r.conditions.with query := r.buildConditions() r.conditions.with = with - var err error + errChan := make(chan error, 1) cursorChan := make(chan contractsorm.Cursor) go func() { var rows *sql.Rows - rows, err = query.instance.Rows() + rows, err := query.instance.Rows() if err != nil { + errChan <- err close(cursorChan) return } defer rows.Close() for rows.Next() { val := make(map[string]any) err = query.instance.ScanRows(rows, val) if err != nil { + errChan <- err close(cursorChan) return } cursorChan <- &CursorImpl{query: r, row: val} } close(cursorChan) }() - return cursorChan, err + select { + case err := <-errChan: + return nil, err + default: + return cursorChan, nil + } }
Line range hint
1309-1329: Redefinition of 'err' variable may shadow previous declarationIn the
refreshConnectionmethod, the variableerris redeclared inside theif !okblock at line 1317. This shadows the outererrvariable and may lead to unexpected behavior.Remove the redundant
var err errordeclaration inside the block to avoid shadowing:query, ok := r.queries[connection] if !ok { - var err error query, err = BuildQuery(r.ctx, r.config, connection) if err != nil { return nil, err } if r.queries == nil { r.queries = make(map[string]*Query) } r.queries[connection] = query }database/gorm/test_utils.go (2)
Line range hint
223-244: ConfirmgetMockDriverusage and error handlingThe
getMockDriverfunction is now unexported. Ensure that this function is not required outside of this package. Additionally, consider handling errors without usingpanic, which can be disruptive.To improve error handling, you might return the error and handle it at a higher level:
-func NewTestQuery(docker testing.DatabaseDriver, withPrefixAndSingular ...bool) *TestQuery { +func NewTestQuery(docker testing.DatabaseDriver, withPrefixAndSingular ...bool) (*TestQuery, error) { ... - panic(fmt.Sprintf("connect to %s failed: %v", docker.Driver().String(), err)) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("connect to %s failed: %w", docker.Driver().String(), err)
Line range hint
592-625: Verify SQL table creation for different driversIn the
peoplestable creation functions, ensure that the SQL statements are compatible with the respective databases after changing tocontractsdatabase.Driver. Check for any syntax discrepancies.Consider parameterizing common SQL components to reduce duplication and potential errors across different driver implementations.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (9)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.summocks/database/Configs.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/gorm/Gorm.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/gorm/Initialize.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/orm/Orm.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/orm/Query.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/foundation/Application.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/testing/Database.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/testing/DatabaseDriver.gois excluded by!mocks/**
📒 Files selected for processing (53)
- contracts/database/config.go (1 hunks)
- contracts/database/gorm/wire_interface.go (0 hunks)
- contracts/database/orm/constants.go (0 hunks)
- contracts/database/orm/orm.go (3 hunks)
- contracts/foundation/application.go (1 hunks)
- contracts/testing/testing.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/migrate.go (5 hunks)
- database/console/migrate_creator.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/test_utils.go (1 hunks)
- database/db/config.go (0 hunks)
- database/db/config_test.go (0 hunks)
- database/db/configs.go (1 hunks)
- database/db/configs_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/db/dsn.go (1 hunks)
- database/db/dsn_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/gorm/cursor.go (1 hunks)
- database/gorm/dialector.go (1 hunks)
- database/gorm/dialector_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/gorm/event.go (2 hunks)
- database/gorm/event_test.go (5 hunks)
- database/gorm/gorm.go (5 hunks)
- database/gorm/query.go (61 hunks)
- database/gorm/query_test.go (11 hunks)
- database/gorm/test_utils.go (67 hunks)
- database/gorm/to_sql.go (1 hunks)
- database/gorm/to_sql_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/gorm/wire.go (0 hunks)
- database/gorm/wire_gen.go (0 hunks)
- database/migration/blueprint_test.go (3 hunks)
- database/migration/schema.go (2 hunks)
- database/migration/schema_test.go (5 hunks)
- database/migration/sql_driver.go (2 hunks)
- database/orm.go (5 hunks)
- database/orm_test.go (3 hunks)
- database/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- database/wire.go (0 hunks)
- database/wire_gen.go (0 hunks)
- database/wire_interface.go (0 hunks)
- foundation/application_test.go (10 hunks)
- foundation/container.go (1 hunks)
- foundation/container_test.go (1 hunks)
- go.mod (0 hunks)
- support/docker/mysql.go (2 hunks)
- support/docker/mysql_test.go (2 hunks)
- support/docker/postgres.go (2 hunks)
- support/docker/postgres_test.go (2 hunks)
- support/docker/sqlite.go (2 hunks)
- support/docker/sqlite_test.go (2 hunks)
- support/docker/sqlserver.go (2 hunks)
- support/docker/sqlserver_test.go (3 hunks)
- testing/docker/database.go (3 hunks)
- testing/docker/database_test.go (10 hunks)
- testing/docker/docker_test.go (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (10)
- contracts/database/gorm/wire_interface.go
- contracts/database/orm/constants.go
- database/db/config.go
- database/db/config_test.go
- database/gorm/wire.go
- database/gorm/wire_gen.go
- database/wire.go
- database/wire_gen.go
- database/wire_interface.go
- go.mod
🔇 Additional comments (125)
contracts/testing/testing.go (2)
34-34: LGTM. Verify interface implementations.The change from
Driver() orm.DrivertoDriver() database.Driveris consistent with the import statement modification and aligns with the move towards a more general database abstraction.To ensure all implementations of the
DatabaseDriverinterface are updated accordingly, please run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for implementations of the DatabaseDriver interface # Test: Search for struct types that implement DatabaseDriver. Expect: All implementations use database.Driver ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type $_ struct { $$$ } func ($_ $_) Driver() $ret { $$$ }' # Test: Search for any remaining references to orm.Driver. Expect: No results or only in comments rg --type go "orm\.Driver"Please review the results to ensure all implementations have been updated to use
database.Driver.
Line range hint
1-58: LGTM. Ensure comprehensive testing.The changes in this file successfully generalize the database interactions by moving from a specific ORM package to a more general database package. This aligns well with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component.
Given the potentially far-reaching effects of these changes, please ensure:
- All implementations of the
DatabaseDriverinterface have been updated.- Any code that previously relied on specific ORM functionality has been appropriately refactored.
- Comprehensive tests have been added or updated to cover these changes.
Run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old ORM package:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old ORM package # Test: Search for any remaining imports of the old ORM package. Expect: No results rg --type go 'import \((?s:.)*"github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/database/orm"(?s:.)*\)' # Test: Search for any uses of orm package. Expect: No results or only in comments rg --type go '\borm\.'Review the results to ensure the refactoring is complete across the codebase.
support/docker/sqlite.go (3)
Line range hint
1-70: Clarify the relationship between these changes and removing "wire".The changes in this file, particularly the shift from "orm" to "database", appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort. However, it's not immediately clear how these changes relate to the PR objective of removing "wire".
Could you please clarify:
- How do these changes in the SQLite implementation contribute to removing "wire"?
- Are there other files in this PR that more directly address the removal of "wire"?
To help understand the scope of the changes, let's check for "wire"-related code:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for "wire"-related code and imports # Search for "wire" imports echo "Checking for 'wire' imports:" rg --type go 'import \(.*"github\.com/google/wire".*\)' # Search for "wire" function calls or annotations echo "Checking for 'wire' function calls or annotations:" rg --type go '(wire\.Build|\/\/\+build wireinject|\/\/go:build wireinject)'
9-9: LGTM. Verify import consistency across the codebase.The change from
ormtodatabaseimport looks good and aligns with the method signature update. This suggests a refactoring of the package structure to a more general database approach.To ensure consistency, let's verify that this import change has been applied across the codebase:
39-40: LGTM. Verify impact on dependent code.The changes to the
Driver()method signature and return value are consistent with the import path change. The functionality remains the same, with only type updates.To ensure that this change doesn't break any dependent code, let's verify its usage across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let's correct the verification scripts to properly check for usages of
SqliteImpl.Driver()and ensure there are no remaining references toorm.Driver.
Let's proceed by running corrected verification scripts to ensure proper detection of
SqliteImpl.Driver()usages andorm.Driverreferences.
Verification Successful
No usages of
SqliteImpl.Driver()ororm.Driverwere found in the codebase. The changes are consistent and do not affect dependent code.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of the SqliteImpl.Driver() method # Search for usages of SqliteImpl.Driver() echo "Checking for SqliteImpl.Driver() usages:" rg --type go 'SqliteImpl.*\.Driver\(\)' # Search for any remaining type assertions or conversions involving orm.Driver echo "Checking for remaining orm.Driver type assertions or conversions:" rg --type go 'orm\.Driver'Length of output: 561
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of SqliteImpl.Driver() method and orm.Driver references # Check for usages of SqliteImpl.Driver() echo "Checking for SqliteImpl.Driver() usages:" rg --type go 'SqliteImpl\..*Driver\(\)' # Check for any remaining orm.Driver type assertions or conversions echo "Checking for remaining orm.Driver type assertions or conversions:" rg --type go 'orm\.Driver'Length of output: 302
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of SqliteImpl.Driver() method and orm.Driver references # Check for usages of SqliteImpl.Driver() echo "Checking for SqliteImpl.Driver() usages:" rg --type go 'SqliteImpl\..*Driver\(\)' # Check for any remaining orm\.Driver type assertions or conversions echo "Checking for remaining orm.Driver type assertions or conversions:" rg --type go 'orm\.Driver'Length of output: 302
support/docker/sqlite_test.go (3)
8-8: LGTM: Import change aligns with PR objectiveThe change from importing an ORM package to the
contracts/databasepackage aligns with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component. This modification suggests a shift towards a more decoupled and flexible database interface.
74-74: LGTM: Driver constant update is consistentThe change from
orm.DriverSqlitetodatabase.DriverSqliteis consistent with the earlier import statement modification. This update maintains the test's functionality while adapting to the new package structure, further supporting the removal of the "wire" component.
Line range hint
1-85: Overall changes align with PR objectiveThe modifications in this file, including the import statement change and the driver constant update, are consistent with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component. These changes appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to transition from an ORM-specific implementation to a more generic database interface.
The test functionality remains intact, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the codebase during this transition. However, it's important to ensure that similar changes have been applied consistently across the entire codebase.
To verify the consistency of these changes across the codebase, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No Remaining References to Old ORM Package
The executed scripts confirm that all references to the old ORM package and
orm.DriverSqlitehave been successfully removed. Additionally, the usage ofdatabase.DriverSqliteis consistent across the codebase, aligning with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old ORM package and inconsistent usage of database drivers. # Test 1: Search for any remaining imports of the old ORM package echo "Checking for remaining imports of the old ORM package:" rg --type go 'import.*"github\.com/goravel/framework/database/orm"' # Test 2: Search for any remaining uses of orm.DriverSqlite echo "Checking for remaining uses of orm.DriverSqlite:" rg --type go 'orm\.DriverSqlite' # Test 3: Verify consistent usage of the new database.DriverSqlite echo "Verifying consistent usage of database.DriverSqlite:" rg --type go 'database\.DriverSqlite'Length of output: 3802
support/docker/sqlserver_test.go (3)
16-16: LGTM! Consistent type update.The change in the type of
mockConfigfrom*configmocks.Configto*mocksconfig.Configis consistent with the import alias change. This update maintains the integrity of the test suite structure.
Line range hint
1-89: Summary: Changes look good and align with PR objectives.The modifications in this file are consistent with the PR's goal of removing the "wire" component. The changes primarily involve updating import paths and their corresponding usage, reflecting a restructuring of the framework's database package. No functional changes were introduced, and the integrity of the test suite has been maintained.
Key points:
- Import paths have been updated to reflect the new package structure.
- The mock configuration import has been renamed for consistency.
- Type declarations and method calls have been updated to match the new import structure.
These changes contribute to streamlining the codebase without altering its core functionality. The PR objectives have been met for this file.
79-79: LGTM! Verify similar changes across the codebase.The update from
orm.DriverSqlservertodatabase.DriverSqlserveris consistent with the import path changes. The test's functionality remains unchanged.To ensure similar changes have been applied consistently across the codebase, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful!
All instances of
orm.DriverSqlserverhave been removed, anddatabase.DriverSqlserveris consistently used across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new database driver reference across the codebase # Test 1: Check for any remaining uses of the old driver reference echo "Checking for old driver reference usage:" rg --type go "orm\.DriverSqlserver" # Test 2: Verify the usage of the new driver reference echo "Checking new driver reference usage:" rg --type go "database\.DriverSqlserver"Length of output: 2671
support/docker/postgres_test.go (3)
78-78: LGTM. Consistent with import change.The update from
orm.DriverPostgrestodatabase.DriverPostgresis consistent with the earlier import change. This modification correctly adapts the test to use the more general database contract while maintaining the original test functionality.
Line range hint
1-90: Overall changes look good. Consider broader impact.The changes in this file are consistent and well-executed, shifting from ORM-specific to more general database contracts. This aligns with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component.
However, given the nature of these changes:
- Ensure that all references to
orm.DriverPostgreshave been updated throughout the codebase.- Verify that any code depending on ORM-specific functionality has been appropriately refactored.
- Consider updating documentation to reflect these architectural changes.
To assist in this broader review, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Perform a broader check for potential impacts of the ORM to database contract change # Test 1: Check for any remaining references to orm.Driver echo "Checking for remaining references to orm.Driver:" rg --type go "orm\.Driver" # Test 2: Look for potential ORM-specific method calls that might need refactoring echo "Checking for potential ORM-specific method calls:" rg --type go "\b(Create|Update|Delete|Where|Order|Limit|Offset)\b" # Test 3: Check for files that might need documentation updates echo "Files that might need documentation updates:" rg --type go --files-with-matches "database/orm"This script will help identify areas that might need attention due to the architectural changes.
8-8: LGTM. Verify impact on codebase.The change from
contracts/database/ormtocontracts/databasealigns with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component. This shift to a more general database package is a good practice for flexibility.To ensure this change doesn't introduce issues elsewhere in the codebase, please run the following script:
support/docker/mysql_test.go (2)
76-76: LGTM. Verify constant usage across the codebase.The change from
orm.DriverMysqltodatabase.DriverMysqlis consistent with the import path change and the PR objective. The functionality remains the same, only the package reference has been updated.To ensure all occurrences of this constant have been updated, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining occurrences of the old constant reference # Test: Search for the old constant reference. Expect: No results. rg --type go "orm\.DriverMysql" # Test: Search for the new constant reference. Expect: At least one result (this file). rg --type go "database\.DriverMysql"
Line range hint
1-86: Overall changes look good. Verify consistency across the codebase.The changes in this file are minimal and don't affect the overall functionality of the tests. The import path and driver constant updates are consistent with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component.
To ensure these changes are applied consistently across the entire codebase:
- Verify that all imports of
github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/database/ormhave been updated togithub.com/goravel/framework/contracts/database.- Check that all references to
orm.DriverMysqlhave been changed todatabase.DriverMysql.- Run the test suite to confirm that these changes haven't introduced any regressions.
Please run the following script to perform a broader check across the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Perform a broader check for consistency across the codebase # Test 1: Check for any remaining old import paths echo "Checking for old import paths:" rg --type go "github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/database/orm" # Test 2: Check for any remaining old constant references echo "Checking for old constant references:" rg --type go "orm\.DriverMysql" # Test 3: Verify the presence of new import paths echo "Verifying new import paths:" rg --type go "github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/database" # Test 4: Verify the presence of new constant references echo "Verifying new constant references:" rg --type go "database\.DriverMysql"If any unexpected results are found, please review and update the affected files accordingly.
testing/docker/database.go (5)
8-8: LGTM: Import addition is consistent with code changes.The new import for
contractsormis appropriate for the subsequent changes in the file, particularly the addition of theormfield in theDatabasestruct.
45-49: LGTM: Function update consistent with struct changes.The initialization of the
ormfield in theNewDatabasefunction is consistent with the changes made to theDatabasestruct. This update properly integrates the new ORM-based approach, replacing the previous app-based initialization.
65-65: LGTM: Seed method updated consistently.The
Seedmethod has been updated consistently with theBuildmethod. The receiver name change improves readability, and the use ofr.artisan.Call(command)aligns with the new implementation approach, likely contributing to the removal of the "wire" component.Also applies to: 74-74
Line range hint
1-74: Overall assessment: Changes are well-implemented and align with PR objectives.The modifications in this file consistently implement a new ORM-based approach, likely contributing to the removal of the "wire" component as stated in the PR objectives. The refactoring improves the code structure and maintainability. All changes are logically sound and well-integrated into the existing codebase.
A few key points:
- The new
ormfield and its initialization are properly implemented.- Method signatures and implementations have been updated consistently.
- The
BuildandSeedmethods now use direct ORM and Artisan calls, replacing the previous approach.These changes appear to successfully contribute to the removal of the "wire" component while maintaining the functionality of the
Databasestruct and its methods.
20-20: LGTM: Struct change aligns with refactoring goals.The addition of the
ormfield to theDatabasestruct is consistent with the refactoring to use ORM directly. This change appears to be part of the effort to remove the "wire" component as mentioned in the PR objectives.To ensure the complete removal of the "wire" component, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: "wire" component has been fully removed.
All checks confirm that there are no remaining imports, usages, or related files for the "wire" component in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of "wire" component from the codebase # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports of "wire" echo "Checking for 'wire' imports:" rg --type go 'import.*".*wire.*"' # Test 2: Check for any remaining uses of "wire" in the code echo "Checking for 'wire' usage in code:" rg --type go '\bwire\b' --iglob '!*_test.go' # Test 3: Check for any "wire" related files echo "Checking for 'wire' related files:" fd -e go wireLength of output: 1045
database/db/dsn_test.go (4)
7-9: LGTM: Import statements updated appropriately.The import statements have been updated to reflect the new test structure. The addition of the
assertpackage and the direct import of thedatabasepackage are appropriate for the refactored tests.
20-27: LGTM: testConfig type updated correctly.The
testConfigvariable type has been updated fromdatabasecontract.Configtodatabase.Config, which is consistent with the new import statement and aligns with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component.
82-87: LGTM: Well-structured test execution with subtests.The test execution is well-organized using a loop and subtests. This approach provides clear separation between test cases and allows for detailed reporting of test results. The use of
assert.Equalfor comparing the generated DSN with the expected value is appropriate and easy to understand.
Line range hint
1-87: Overall: Excellent refactoring of the test structure.The changes in this file significantly improve the test structure by implementing table-driven tests. This new approach is more maintainable, easier to extend, and aligns well with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component. The test cases cover a comprehensive range of scenarios, and the execution is well-organized using subtests.
A few minor suggestions were made to further enhance the code:
- Adding a comment to explain the purpose of the test cases.
- Considering an additional test case for non-default configuration values.
These changes have positively impacted the overall quality of the test file. Great job on the refactoring!
database/service_provider.go (1)
56-56: Approve the receiver name change inregisterCommands.The change of the receiver name from
databasetoris consistent with the changes in other methods and aligns with Go naming conventions for short receiver names.testing/docker/docker_test.go (4)
10-10: LGTM: Import statement for mocksorm added.The addition of the mocksorm import is consistent with the changes made in the test cases and is necessary for creating mock ORM instances.
38-38: Excellent addition of mock ORM in MySQL test case.The creation of a mock ORM instance and its integration into the test setup enhances the test coverage and follows good unit testing practices. This change allows for better isolation of the database functionality being tested.
Also applies to: 42-42
58-58: LGTM: Consistent addition of mock ORM in PostgreSQL test case.The changes in the PostgreSQL test case mirror those made in the MySQL test case, maintaining consistency and parity between the two database types. This ensures that both database connections are tested with the same level of mocking and isolation.
Also applies to: 62-62
Line range hint
1-70: Overall improvement in test coverage and consistency.The changes in this file focus on enhancing the test cases for both MySQL and PostgreSQL database connections by introducing mock ORM functionality. This improvement:
- Increases test isolation by mocking the ORM layer.
- Maintains consistency between different database type tests.
- Aligns with the PR objective of removing "wire" by refactoring the testing approach.
These modifications improve the overall quality and reliability of the tests without changing their fundamental structure or purpose.
database/migration/schema.go (2)
Line range hint
1-90: Please clarify the relationship between these changes and the PR objective.The changes in this file involve updating import statements and database driver constant references. However, the PR objective mentions removing the "wire" component, which is not directly addressed in these changes. Could you please provide more context on how these modifications relate to the removal of the "wire" component?
To better understand the context, let's check for any mentions of "wire" in the codebase:
7-7: LGTM! Verify usage ofcontractsorm.The addition of the
contractsdatabaseimport aligns with the changes in thegetGrammarfunction. However, since thecontractsormimport is retained, it's worth verifying its usage in the rest of the file.Let's verify the usage of
contractsormin the file:✅ Verification successful
Verified: The
contractsormimport and its usage are appropriate and consistent with the removal of the "wire" component.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of contractsorm in the file # Test: Search for contractsorm usage in the file rg --type go 'contractsorm' database/migration/schema.goLength of output: 1509
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of contractsorm in the file # Test: Search for contractsorm usage in the file rg --type go 'contractsorm' database/migration/schema.goLength of output: 285
database/gorm/to_sql.go (3)
12-12: Verify usage ofNewToSqlfunction across the codebase.The parameter type in the
NewToSqlfunction has been changed from*QueryImplto*Query. This change is consistent with the modification in theToSqlstruct. However, we need to ensure that all callers ofNewToSqlare updated to pass a*Queryinstead of a*QueryImpl.To verify the correct usage of
NewToSql, run the following script:This will help us identify all places where
NewToSqlis called and confirm that they are passing a*Querytype argument.
Line range hint
1-124: LGTM! Suggest thorough testing of affected functionality.The changes from
*QueryImplto*Queryappear to be part of a larger refactoring effort. The rest of the file remains unchanged, which suggests that theQuerytype likely provides the same interface asQueryImpl. However, to ensure the integrity of the codebase:
- Verify that all method calls on
queryare still valid with the new*Querytype.- Conduct thorough testing of all functionalities that involve the
ToSqlstruct and its methods.- Update any relevant documentation or comments that might reference
QueryImpl.To assist in verifying the compatibility, run the following script:
This will help identify all method calls on the
queryfield, allowing you to verify that they are all supported by the new*Querytype.
8-8: Verify compatibility of*Querytype with existing methods.The type of the
queryfield has been changed from*QueryImplto*Query. This change suggests a refactoring of the query implementation. Please ensure that all methods using thequeryfield are compatible with the new*Querytype.To verify the compatibility, run the following script:
This will help us confirm that the new
*Querytype provides all the necessary methods and fields used throughout the file.support/docker/postgres.go (2)
73-74: LGTM. Verify impact on dependent code.The
Driver()method has been updated to returndatabase.Driverinstead oform.Driver, which is consistent with the import statement change. The return value has also been updated accordingly.Let's verify if this change impacts any other parts of the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any code that might be affected by the Driver() method change # Test 1: Search for any code that uses the Driver() method of PostgresImpl echo "Checking for usage of PostgresImpl.Driver():" rg --type go 'PostgresImpl.*Driver\(\)' # Test 2: Search for any code that expects orm.Driver echo "Checking for code expecting orm.Driver:" rg --type go 'orm\.Driver'
10-10: LGTM. Verify package usage consistency.The import statement has been updated to use the more general
databasepackage instead of the specificormpackage. This change aligns with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component.Let's verify if this change is consistent across the codebase:
database/console/test_utils.go (3)
8-8: Function signature update looks good.The change from
contractsorm.Drivertodatabase.Driveris consistent with the import statement modification and maintains the function's purpose while adapting to the new package structure.
4-4: Approve import change and verify its impact.The change from "contractsorm" to "database" aligns with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component. This modification suggests a shift towards a more general database package.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended consequences, please run the following script to check for any remaining usage of "contractsorm" in the codebase:
10-16: Switch-case updates are consistent and complete.The case statements have been correctly updated to use
database.Driver*instead ofcontractsorm.Driver*, maintaining consistency with the import and function signature changes. All database driver types are still covered.To ensure these changes haven't affected the functionality, please verify that the existing tests still pass and consider adding new tests if necessary. Run the following command to check the test coverage for this file:
database/migration/sql_driver.go (1)
56-69: LGTM. Verify constant definitions in the new package.The switch statement update correctly reflects the change from
ormtodatabasepackage. The logic for handling different database drivers remains intact, which is good.Let's verify the constant definitions in the new package:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the constant definitions in the new database package # Test: Check the constant definitions in the database package echo "Checking constant definitions in the database package" ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'const ( $$$ DriverPostgres $_ DriverSqlite $_ DriverSqlserver $_ $$$ )' | rg 'github\.com/goravel/framework/contracts/database'This will help ensure that the constants used in the switch statement are properly defined in the new package.
database/console/migrate_creator.go (1)
9-9: Approve import change and verify its impact.The change from
ormtodatabaseimport is consistent with the PR objective. This refactoring to a more general database package is a good practice.To ensure this change doesn't introduce issues elsewhere in the codebase, please run the following script:
database/migration/schema_test.go (4)
9-9: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The addition of the
contractsdatabaseimport is consistent with the changes in the driver type throughout the file. This aligns well with the PR objective of updating related components.
42-43: LGTM: SetupSuite method updated correctly.The change from
contractsorm.Drivertocontractsdatabase.Driverin the map initialization is consistent with the struct definition update. The rest of the method remains unchanged, which is correct as the underlying logic doesn't need modification.
90-90: LGTM: initTest function signature updated correctly.The change from
contractsorm.Drivertocontractsdatabase.Driverin the function signature is consistent with the overall update of the driver type in the file. The rest of the function remains unchanged, which is correct as the underlying logic doesn't need modification.
Line range hint
1-103: Overall, the changes look good with room for minor improvements.The updates in this file consistently replace
contractsorm.Driverwithcontractsdatabase.Driver, aligning with the PR objective of removing "wire" and updating related components. This change improves the consistency of the codebase by using more general database contracts.To further enhance the code:
- Consider renaming
driverToTestDBtodriverToTestDatabasefor improved clarity.- Improve test coverage in the
TestConnectionmethod by parameterizing the connection string to test multiple database drivers.Once these suggestions are addressed, the changes will be ready for merging.
To ensure all instances of
contractsorm.Driverhave been replaced, run the following script:✅ Verification successful
All instances of
contractsorm.Driverhave been successfully replaced.The executed verification script found no remaining instances of
contractsorm.Driverindatabase/migration/schema_test.go, confirming that the replacement was completed as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all instances of contractsorm.Driver have been replaced # Test: Search for any remaining instances of contractsorm.Driver remaining_instances=$(rg --type go 'contractsorm\.Driver' database/migration/schema_test.go) if [ -z "$remaining_instances" ]; then echo "All instances of contractsorm.Driver have been replaced successfully." else echo "Found remaining instances of contractsorm.Driver:" echo "$remaining_instances" fiLength of output: 260
support/docker/mysql.go (2)
10-10: Approve import statement change and verify its impact.The change in the import statement from
github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/database/ormtogithub.com/goravel/framework/contracts/databasealigns with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component. This modification suggests a restructuring of database-related packages in the framework.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new database import path and identify any remaining references to the old path. # Test 1: Check for usage of the new import path echo "Checking for usage of new import path:" rg --type go "github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/database" # Test 2: Check for any remaining references to the old import path echo "Checking for remaining references to old import path:" rg --type go "github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/database/orm" # The results of these tests will help identify if the change has been consistently applied across the codebase.
78-79: ApproveDrivermethod changes and verify usage.The changes to the
Drivermethod signature and return value are consistent with the import statement modification and align with the PR objective. The shift fromorm.Drivertodatabase.Driversuggests a move towards a more abstract database interface, which could provide greater flexibility in database implementations.To ensure this change doesn't break existing code and is consistently applied, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Driver method changes have been successfully verified.
The
Drivermethod now returnsdatabase.Driver, and its usage is consistent throughout the codebase. Remainingorm.Driverreferences are limited to mock and testing files, ensuring that the main functionality remains unaffected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the Driver method and identify any remaining references to the old return type. # Test 1: Check for usage of the new Driver method return type echo "Checking for usage of new Driver method return type:" rg --type go "database\.Driver" # Test 2: Check for any remaining references to the old Driver method return type echo "Checking for remaining references to old Driver method return type:" rg --type go "orm\.Driver" # Test 3: Check for any calls to the Driver method to ensure they're compatible with the new return type echo "Checking for calls to the Driver method:" rg --type go "\.Driver\(\)" # The results of these tests will help identify if the change has been consistently applied and if any code needs to be updated to work with the new return type.Length of output: 17837
foundation/container_test.go (2)
103-105: Good addition of Refresh testThe addition of this test case for the Refresh functionality is valuable. It ensures that when a singleton is refreshed, it's properly removed from the instances map. This helps maintain the integrity of the container's state management.
100-113: Improvements to TestSingleton, but unclear relation to PR objectivesThe changes to the TestSingleton method improve the test coverage and robustness of the Container implementation, particularly around the Refresh functionality. This is a positive change that enhances the quality of the tests.
However, it's worth noting that these changes don't seem directly related to the stated PR objective of removing the "wire" component.
To ensure we're not missing any context, let's check for any mentions of "wire" in the codebase:
This will help us understand if there are any other changes related to removing the "wire" component that we should be aware of in the context of these test modifications.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: "wire" Removal Not Addressed in Changes
The search results indicate that "wire" is only present in the generated protobuf file
grpc/test.pb.go, which pertains to protobuf parsing and is unrelated to the "wire" component targeted for removal in this PR. Therefore, the changes to theTestSingletonmethod enhance test coverage but do not address the removal of the "wire" dependency.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for "wire" mentions in the codebase rg --type go "wire"Length of output: 1496
support/docker/sqlserver.go (2)
72-73: LGTM. Method signature correctly updated.The
Drivermethod signature has been properly updated to returndatabase.Driverinstead oform.Driver, which is consistent with the import changes and the PR objective.
10-10: LGTM. Verify consistent usage across the codebase.The import statement has been correctly updated from
ormtodatabase, which aligns with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component.To ensure consistency, let's verify if this change has been applied throughout the codebase:
database/gorm/cursor.go (1)
16-16: LGTM. Verify Query type compatibility.The change from
*QueryImplto*Querylooks good and aligns with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component. This refactoring likely simplifies or generalizes the query interface.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any compatibility issues, please run the following verification:
These checks will help confirm that the
Querytype is properly defined and implements all necessary methods, and that there are no lingering references toQueryImplin the codebase.contracts/foundation/application.go (1)
126-127: Approve the newRefreshmethod with suggestions.The addition of the
Refreshmethod to theApplicationinterface is a good enhancement to allow refreshing instances. However, there are a couple of points to consider:
- It would be beneficial to add documentation for this method to clarify its purpose and usage.
- This change might require updates to existing implementations of the
Applicationinterface.Consider adding a comment to document the
Refreshmethod, for example:// Refresh refreshes an instance associated with the given key. // It updates or recreates the instance in the application's container. Refresh(key any)To ensure all implementations of the
Applicationinterface are updated, run the following script:This script will help identify potential implementations of the
Applicationinterface that might need updating to include the newRefreshmethod.database/gorm/to_sql_test.go (16)
36-36: LGTM: Type assertion update in TestCountThe change from
*QueryImplto*Queryis consistent with the refactoring effort. The test functionality remains intact.
39-39: LGTM: Consistent type assertion update in TestCountThe change from
*QueryImplto*Queryis consistent with the previous update in this method. The test functionality remains unchanged.
45-45: LGTM: Type assertion update in TestCreateThe change from
*QueryImplto*Queryis consistent with the ongoing refactoring. The test functionality remains intact.
48-48: LGTM: Consistent type assertion update in TestCreateThe change from
*QueryImplto*Queryis consistent with the previous updates. The test functionality remains unchanged.
58-58: LGTM: Type assertion update in TestDeleteThe change from
*QueryImplto*Queryis consistent with the ongoing refactoring. The test functionality remains intact.
61-61: LGTM: Consistent type assertion update in TestDeleteThe change from
*QueryImplto*Queryis consistent with the previous updates. The test functionality remains unchanged.
64-64: LGTM: Consistent type assertion update in TestDeleteThe change from
*QueryImplto*Queryis consistent with the previous updates in this method and others. The test functionality remains intact.
69-69: LGTM: Consistent type assertion update in TestDeleteThe change from
*QueryImplto*Queryis consistent with the previous updates in this method and others. The test functionality remains unchanged.
74-74: LGTM: Consistent type assertion updates in TestFindThe changes from
*QueryImplto*Queryin all instances within the TestFind method are consistent with the ongoing refactoring. The test functionalities remain intact.Also applies to: 77-77, 80-80, 83-83
88-88: LGTM: Consistent type assertion updates in TestFirstThe changes from
*QueryImplto*Queryin both instances within the TestFirst method are consistent with the ongoing refactoring. The test functionalities remain unchanged.Also applies to: 91-91
96-96: LGTM: Consistent type assertion updates in TestForceDeleteThe changes from
*QueryImplto*Queryin all instances within the TestForceDelete method are consistent with the ongoing refactoring. The test functionalities remain intact.Also applies to: 99-99, 102-102, 105-105
110-110: LGTM: Consistent type assertion updates in TestGetThe changes from
*QueryImplto*Queryin both instances within the TestGet method are consistent with the ongoing refactoring. The test functionalities remain unchanged.Also applies to: 113-113
118-118: LGTM: Consistent type assertion updates in TestPluckThe changes from
*QueryImplto*Queryin both instances within the TestPluck method are consistent with the ongoing refactoring. The test functionalities remain intact.Also applies to: 121-121
126-126: LGTM: Consistent type assertion updates in TestSaveThe changes from
*QueryImplto*Queryin both instances within the TestSave method are consistent with the ongoing refactoring. The test functionalities remain unchanged.Also applies to: 129-129
136-136: LGTM: Consistent type assertion updates in TestSum and TestUpdateThe changes from
*QueryImplto*Queryin all instances within the TestSum and TestUpdate methods are consistent with the ongoing refactoring throughout the file. The test functionalities remain intact.Also applies to: 139-139, 144-144, 147-147, 152-152, 155-155, 158-158, 163-163, 170-170, 175-175
Line range hint
1-180: Summary: Consistent refactoring of type assertionsThis change consistently updates all type assertions from
*QueryImplto*Querythroughout the file. This refactoring appears to be part of a larger effort to standardize the query type used in the GORM package. The changes are applied systematically across all test methods, maintaining the existing functionality of the tests.Key points:
- All changes are consistent and follow the same pattern.
- No functional changes were made to the test cases.
- The SQL queries generated in the tests remain unchanged.
The refactoring improves code consistency and likely aligns with changes made in the main GORM package. Overall, this is a clean and well-executed refactoring.
database/gorm/event.go (3)
23-23: LGTM. Consistent with struct change.The
NewEventfunction signature update is consistent with theEventstruct modification. The function body correctly remains unchanged as it's only assigning the passed query to the struct field.
20-20: LGTM. Verify impact on codebase.The change from
*QueryImplto*Queryaligns with the PR objective to remove the "wire" component. This modification suggests a move towards a more generic or interface-based approach.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any unintended consequences, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to
QueryImplin the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining references to QueryImpl # Test: Search for QueryImpl references rg --type go 'QueryImpl'
95-95: LGTM. Verify NewQuery functionality.The
Querymethod update is consistent with the previous modifications, moving away from theQueryImpltype. The method now creates a new query usingNewQuerywith the same parameters as before, maintaining the creation of a new database session.To ensure the
NewQueryfunction provides the same functionality as the previousNewQueryImpl, please run the following script to locate and review theNewQueryfunction:✅ Verification successful
Change Verified:
NewQueryappropriately replacesNewQueryImpl.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate and review the NewQuery function # Test: Search for NewQuery function definition ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewQuery($_, $_, $_, $_, $_) *Query { $$$ }'Length of output: 162
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate and review the NewQuery function # Test: Search for NewQuery function definition using ast-grep ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewQuery($_, $_, $_, $_, $_) *Query {\n $$$\n}' .Length of output: 834
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate and review the NewQueryImpl function # Test: Search for NewQueryImpl function definition using ast-grep ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewQueryImpl($_, $_, $_, $_, $_) *QueryImpl {\n $$$\n}' .Length of output: 93
contracts/database/orm/orm.go (1)
Line range hint
1-214: Summary: Good improvements to the ORM interfaceThe changes in this file are well-aligned with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component. The additions and modifications to the ORM and Query interfaces provide useful enhancements without introducing new dependencies.
Key points:
- The new
Refresh()method in theOrminterface allows for resetting the ORM instance state.- The change in the
Driver()method's return type in theQueryinterface provides a more specific type for the database driver.These changes should improve the flexibility and clarity of the ORM system. Ensure that all existing implementations are updated to accommodate these changes, particularly the
Driver()method return type.foundation/container.go (1)
334-336: Please provide context on how this relates to removing "wire".The PR objective mentions removing the "wire" component, but it's not immediately clear how the addition of the
Refreshmethod relates to this goal. Could you provide more context on how this change fits into the larger refactoring effort?To ensure this change is properly integrated, let's verify its usage across the codebase:
This will help us understand how the new method is being used and if any additional changes or documentation might be needed.
database/migration/blueprint_test.go (4)
9-9: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The addition of the
databasepackage import aligns with the PR objective and helps consolidate database-related functionality.
25-26: LGTM: TestBlueprintTestSuite function updated correctly.The initialization of the
grammarsmap now usesdatabase.DriverPostgres, which is consistent with the previous changes.To ensure this change is applied consistently across the test files, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of orm.DriverPostgres in test files rg --type go 'orm\.DriverPostgres' '*_test.go'
20-20: LGTM: BlueprintTestSuite struct updated correctly.The
grammarsfield type has been properly updated to usedatabase.Driverinstead oform.Driver, which is consistent with the import changes.To ensure this change is applied consistently across the codebase, please run the following command:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: No remaining instances of
orm.Driverfound.All references to
orm.Driverhave been successfully updated todatabase.Driveracross the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of orm.Driver rg --type go 'orm\.Driver'Length of output: 28
358-358: LGTM: TestToSql method updated correctly.The driver check now uses
database.DriverPostgres, which is consistent with the previous changes.To ensure this change is applied consistently across all test methods, please run the following command:
database/gorm/event_test.go (5)
Line range hint
42-49: LGTM: Consistent renaming of QueryImpl to QueryThe change from
QueryImpltoQueryis consistent with the refactoring mentioned in the summary. The structure and initialization remain the same, ensuring that the test setup is not affected by this change.
Line range hint
88-96: LGTM: Consistent use of Query typeThe change from
QueryImpltoQueryis consistently applied here as well. The structure and initialization of theQuerytype remain unchanged, ensuring that the test behavior is preserved.
Line range hint
116-124: LGTM: Consistent renaming applied to query1The change from
QueryImpltoQueryis consistently applied toquery1. The structure and initialization remain unchanged, maintaining the integrity of the test setup.
Line range hint
1-370: Summary: Consistent renaming with preserved test integrityThe changes in this file are limited to renaming
QueryImpltoQuery, which has been consistently applied throughout the test suite. The structure of the tests, including theEventTestSuiteand individual test cases, remains unchanged. This renaming aligns with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component.Given that this is a renaming change, no new tests were added, which is acceptable. However, it's crucial to ensure that these changes don't introduce any regressions in the test coverage or functionality.
To confirm that the renaming hasn't introduced any unintended side effects, please run the following commands:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any remaining instances of QueryImpl in the codebase echo "Checking for any remaining QueryImpl instances:" rg "QueryImpl" --type go # Run all tests in the gorm package to ensure no regressions echo "Running all tests in the gorm package:" go test -v ./database/gorm/...These commands will help verify that the renaming is complete and that all tests still pass after the changes.
Line range hint
245-253: LGTM: Consistent Query usage in TestValidColumnThe change from
QueryImpltoQueryis consistently applied in theTestValidColumnfunction. Both instances ofQueryinitialization maintain the same structure and purpose as before, preserving the test logic for differentSelectsandOmitsconfigurations.To ensure that the test coverage remains comprehensive after these changes, let's verify the test execution:
Also applies to: 258-266
foundation/application_test.go (11)
15-15: LGTM: New import added for database contractsThe addition of the
contractsdatabaseimport is consistent with the changes made to the database configuration later in the file.
175-177: LGTM: Consistent update of mock expectationsThe changes from
On()toEXPECT()in the TestMakeCache function are consistent with the previous updates and maintain the test's functionality.
202-202: LGTM: Consistent update of mock expectationThe change from
On()toEXPECT()in the TestMakeCrypt function maintains consistency with the previous updates and preserves the test's functionality.
247-250: LGTM: Consistent update of mock expectationsThe changes from
On()toEXPECT()in the TestMakeHash function maintain consistency with the previous updates and preserve the test's functionality.
265-267: LGTM: Consistent update of mock expectationsThe changes from
On()toEXPECT()in the TestMakeLang function maintain consistency with the previous updates and preserve the test's functionality.
378-378: LGTM: Consistent update of mock expectationThe change from
On()toEXPECT()in the TestMakeSchedule function maintains consistency with the previous updates and preserves the test's functionality.
399-401: LGTM: Consistent update of mock expectationsThe changes from
On()toEXPECT()in the TestMakeSession function maintain consistency with the previous updates and preserve the test's functionality.
420-423: LGTM: Consistent update of mock expectationsThe changes from
On()toEXPECT()in the TestMakeStorage function maintain consistency with the previous updates and preserve the test's functionality.
Line range hint
1-443: Summary: Consistent updates to mock expectations and database configurationThe changes in this file primarily involve:
- Updating mock expectations from
On()toEXPECT()throughout the test suite.- Changing the database configuration from MySQL to PostgreSQL in the TestMakeOrm function.
These changes improve the consistency of the test suite and reflect a shift in the project's database strategy. However, it's important to ensure that:
- The new mocking approach is applied consistently across all test files in the project.
- The switch to PostgreSQL is reflected in the main application code and documentation.
To ensure project-wide consistency, run the following commands:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining uses of the old On() method in all test files rg --type go 'mock.*\.On\(' . # Verify that MySQL is no longer used as the primary database rg --type go 'mysql' . # Check for PostgreSQL usage across the project rg --type go 'postgres' .
154-154: LGTM: Updated mock expectation methodThe change from
On()toEXPECT()is consistent with modern mocking libraries. This update improves the readability and maintainability of the test.To ensure all mock expectations have been updated consistently, run the following command:
✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Re-verify Mock Expectations Across the Repository
The previous check failed to locate the
testdirectory. To ensure all mock expectations have been updated consistently, please run the following command:
Verification Complete: No Remaining
On()Methods in Test FilesAll test files have been successfully updated to use
EXPECT(), and there are no remaining instances of the oldOn()method outside of themocks/directory.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining uses of the old On() method in test files rg --type go 'mock.*\.On\(' testLength of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining uses of the old On() method in Go files across the repository rg --type go 'mock.*\.On\(' .Length of output: 149601
310-330: LGTM: Updated database configuration from MySQL to PostgreSQLThe test has been updated to use PostgreSQL instead of MySQL, which is a significant change. This update includes new mock expectations for PostgreSQL-specific configurations.
To ensure that PostgreSQL support is consistently implemented throughout the codebase, run the following commands:
database/gorm/query_test.go (1)
15-15: LGTM: Import added for database packageThe addition of the
databasepackage import is appropriate and necessary for the changes made in the code, particularly for using the database driver constants.contracts/database/config.go (2)
3-8: Constants for Database Drivers are Well-DefinedThe constants for the
Drivertype are properly defined, providing clear and explicit values for supported database drivers.
12-14: Clarify the Necessity of theString()MethodSince
Driveris a type alias forstring, implementing theString()method might be redundant. However, if this is intended to satisfy interfaces likefmt.Stringerfor consistency or future-proofing, it is acceptable.Would you confirm if the
String()method provides additional benefits in your use case?database/db/dsn.go (1)
22-22: Verify the necessity of 'multi_stmts=true' in SQLite DSNThe
multi_stmts=trueparameter is not a recognized option for SQLite DSNs and may have no effect or could potentially cause issues. SQLite typically doesn't require this parameter.Consider removing it if it's unnecessary:
return fmt.Sprintf("%s?multi_stmts=true", config.Database) +return fmt.Sprintf("%s", config.Database)Please check the SQLite driver documentation to confirm supported DSN parameters.
database/gorm/dialector.go (1)
27-41: Verify the Completeness of Supported DriversEnsure that all intended drivers are supported and correctly implemented. Additionally, confirm that there are no additional drivers that need to be accommodated.
Run the following script to list all usage of driver constants and verify the supported drivers:
✅ Verification successful
Completeness of Supported Drivers Verified
All intended database drivers (
mysql,postgres,sqlite,sqlserver) are supported and correctly implemented. No additional drivers are detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all usages of database driver constants in the codebase. # Search for all instances where driver constants are defined or used. rg --type go 'Driver\w+' -A 2Length of output: 110147
database/console/migrate.go (2)
14-16: Imports updated to use thedatabasepackageThe imports have been updated to replace the
ormpackage with thedatabasepackage, which aligns with the goal of removing the "wire" component and streamlines database handling.
28-29: Ensure proper handling of database configurationsThe code now retrieves write configurations using
databasedb.NewConfigs(config, connection).Writes(). Verify that this method accurately captures all necessary configurations, and that any read configurations are handled appropriately elsewhere in the codebase.database/db/configs.go (1)
81-83: EnsureDatabasefield is set correctlyIn the condition
if config.Database == "", the code setsfullConfig.Databaseusing the default configuration. Confirm that this logic aligns with the intended behavior, especially ifconfig.Databasemight be intentionally left empty.Ensure that an empty
Databasefield inconfigshould indeed default to the value from the main configuration. If an empty string is a valid value forDatabase, this logic might override intentional settings.database/gorm/gorm.go (3)
20-23:Builderstruct initialization looks goodThe
Builderstruct is properly defined with the necessary fieldsconfig,configs, andinstance, facilitating a clean and organized initialization process.
26-32:NewGormfunction is correctly implementedThe
NewGormfunction effectively initializes a newBuilderinstance and invokes theBuildmethod, streamlining the creation of the GORM database instance.
Line range hint
35-54:Buildmethod handles configuration appropriatelyThe
Buildmethod correctly retrieves read and write configurations, checks for necessary configurations, initializes the database, and sets up connection pools and read-write separation. Error handling is appropriately managed.database/orm_test.go (1)
30-31: UpdatedOrmSuitestruct fields align with new type definitions—Looks GoodThe
OrmSuitestruct fields have been updated to use*Ormfor theormfield andmap[database.Driver]*gorm.TestQueryfor thetestQueriesfield. This change aligns with the updated type definitions and ensures consistency across the codebase.testing/docker/database_test.go (2)
54-54: Verify Correct Usage of Updated Driver ConstantsThe
mockConfig.EXPECT().GetString()calls now return driver strings fromcontractsdatabase. Ensure that the driver constants likeDriverMysql,DriverPostgres, etc., are correctly defined incontractsdatabaseand that they match the expected values.Also applies to: 64-64, 73-73, 83-83, 92-92, 102-102, 111-111, 121-121, 130-130, 140-140
191-193: Verify theRefreshMethod Corresponds to Updated MocksIn the
TestBuildmethod, the call tos.mockOrm.EXPECT().Refresh().Once()might need updating if theRefreshmethod has moved or changed in the newcontractsdatabasemocks.Run the following script to verify the definition of the
Refreshmethod in the updated mocks:database/db/configs_test.go (1)
36-39:⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent behavior when configurations are empty between
Reads()andWrites()methodsIn
TestReads(), when the configurations are empty,s.configs.Reads()returnsnil(line 38). However, inTestWrites(), when configurations are empty,s.configs.Writes()returns a default configuration (lines 74-83). Please verify whether this difference in behavior is intentional. If not, consider aligning the behavior of theReads()andWrites()methods when configurations are empty.database/gorm/query.go (1)
18-19: Imports updated to new package pathsThe imports for
contractsdatabaseandcontractsormhave been correctly updated to reflect the new package structure.database/gorm/test_utils.go (14)
23-23: Confirm the change ofTestModeltoTestModelMinimumYou've set
TestModeltoTestModelMinimum. This reduces the number of initialized test databases, potentially affecting test coverage for MySQL and SQL Server. Please confirm that this change is intentional and aligns with your testing strategy.
82-83: Update function return types tocontractsdatabase.DriverThe
Queriesfunction now returnsmap[contractsdatabase.Driver]*TestQuery. Ensure that all function usages and type assertions have been updated accordingly to prevent type mismatch errors.
86-87: UpdateQueriesOfReadWritereturn typeThe
QueriesOfReadWritefunction now returnsmap[contractsdatabase.Driver]map[string]orm.Query. Verify that any code utilizing this function handles the new return type correctly.
115-121: Verify driver mappings inQueriesOfReadWriteIn the returned map, only
contractsdatabase.DriverPostgresandcontractsdatabase.DriverSqliteare included whenTestModelisTestModelMinimum. Confirm that excluding other drivers like MySQL and SQL Server is intentional.
157-173: Check driver mappings for full test modelWhen
TestModelis notTestModelMinimum, the mappings include MySQL and SQL Server. Ensure that all necessary drivers are included and correctly configured for comprehensive testing.
181-183: Update return type inQueriesWithPrefixAndSingularThe
QueriesWithPrefixAndSingularfunction's return type has been updated to usecontractsdatabase.Driver. Verify that callers of this function handle the new type appropriately.
192-202: Consistent use ofcontractsdatabase.Driverin driver mapsIn the
queriesfunction, the maps now usecontractsdatabase.Driveras keys. Ensure that any iteration or access of these maps reflects this change to prevent key mismatches.
276-279: Ensure consistency inQueryOfReadWritefunctionThe
QueryOfReadWritefunction now uses the updatedgetMockDriver. Verify that it correctly initializes the mock driver and builds the query without issues.
332-335: Update mock configurations tocontractsdatabase.ConfigThe mock read and write configurations now use
[]contractsdatabase.Config. Ensure that these configurations are correctly set up and that all fields required bycontractsdatabase.Configare provided.
566-569: UpdatetestTablesstruct and constructorThe
testTablesstruct and its constructor now usecontractsdatabase.Driver. Verify that all methods relying ondriverreflect this change and function as expected.
Line range hint
804-843: Consistency ingoravel_usertable creationEnsure that the
goravel_usertable creation scripts are updated correctly for all drivers usingcontractsdatabase.Driver. Verify that the table definitions are consistent across different databases.
Line range hint
918-1002: Confirm relational mappings inbooksandauthorstablesWith the driver changes, ensure that the foreign key relationships and related fields between
booksandauthorsare correctly defined and compatible with each database's requirements.If necessary, update the SQL creation scripts to explicitly define foreign key constraints.
8-8: Ensure consistent usage ofcontractsdatabasepackageThe import statement now references
contractsdatabaseinstead oform. Please verify that all occurrences oform.Driverand related types have been updated to usecontractsdatabase.Driverthroughout the codebase.Here is a script to check for any remaining references to
orm.Driver:✅ Verification successful
Import Consistency Verified Successfully
All occurrences of
orm.Driverhave been updated tocontractsdatabase.Driverthroughout the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find any remaining references to 'orm.Driver' in Go files. rg 'orm\.Driver' --type goLength of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Correctly find any remaining references to 'orm.Driver' in Go files, excluding the 'database/gorm' directory. rg 'orm\.Driver' --type go --glob '!database/gorm/*'Length of output: 54
282-292: Impact of unexportinggetMockDriverfunctionChanging
GetMockDrivertogetMockDriverunexports the function. This could affect other packages relying on it. Please confirm that this function is not used outside its package.Here's a script to find external usages:
✅ Verification successful
Verified:
getMockDriveris not used outside thegormpackage.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for 'GetMockDriver' usages outside the 'gorm' package. rg 'GetMockDriver' --type go --glob '!database/gorm/*'Length of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for 'GetMockDriver' usages outside the 'gorm' package. rg 'GetMockDriver' --type go --glob '!database/gorm/*'Length of output: 54
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
database/orm.go (4)
15-21: LGTM: Struct changes enhance flexibility, but documentation neededThe renaming of the struct and the changes to field types improve the flexibility of the ORM implementation. The addition of the
queriesmap allows for managing multiple queries, which is a good enhancement.However, the purpose and usage of the
refreshfunction are not immediately clear.Could you add a comment explaining the purpose and usage of the
refreshfunction?
24-35: LGTM: Constructor changes align with struct updatesThe
NewOrmfunction changes are consistent with the updates to theOrmstruct. The initialization of thequeriesmap with the default connection is a good practice.However, consider adding error checking for the
queryparameter to ensure it's not nil before proceeding with the initialization.Consider adding a nil check for the
queryparameter:if query == nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("query cannot be nil") }
Line range hint
46-76: LGTM: Connection method enhances flexibility, but error handling could be improvedThe updates to the
Connectionmethod improve the flexibility of the ORM by allowing dynamic creation and caching of connections. The use of thecontractsorm.Orminterface as the return type is consistent with the move towards using contracts.However, the error handling when building a new query could be improved.
Consider returning an error instead of nil when the query building fails:
queue, err := gorm.BuildQuery(r.ctx, r.config, name) if err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to build query for connection %s: %w", name, err) }This would allow the caller to handle the error more effectively.
99-101: Clarify purpose and usage of Refresh methodThe purpose and usage of the
Refreshmethod are not immediately clear. Additionally, theBindingOrmconstant is not defined in the visible code.Could you please add a comment explaining:
- The purpose of the
Refreshmethod- When and how it should be used
- What the
BindingOrmconstant representsAlso, ensure that the
BindingOrmconstant is properly defined and imported.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- database/gorm/test_utils.go (66 hunks)
- database/orm.go (5 hunks)
- database/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- database/service_provider.go
🔇 Additional comments (26)
database/orm.go (5)
9-10: LGTM: Import changes are consistent with refactoringThe addition of the
contractsormimport and the update to the gorm package import align well with the refactoring efforts to use contract interfaces for the ORM implementation.
37-44: LGTM: BuildOrm function improves code organizationThe addition of the
BuildOrmfunction is a good improvement in code organization. It encapsulates the logic for creating a new Orm instance, including the creation of the query usinggorm.BuildQuery. The error handling is appropriate, providing a clear error message if the query building fails.
Line range hint
120-136: Fix potential panics in WithContext methodThe
WithContextmethod now sets the context for all queries, which is a good practice. However, the type assertionsquery := query.(*gorm.Query)andquery := r.query.(*gorm.Query)could panic if the queries are not of type*gorm.Query. This issue was previously flagged in a past review.To fix this, use the two-value form of type assertion:
func (r *Orm) WithContext(ctx context.Context) contractsorm.Orm { for key, query := range r.queries { if gormQuery, ok := query.(*gorm.Query); ok { gormQuery.SetContext(ctx) } else { // Consider logging a warning or error here } } if gormQuery, ok := r.query.(*gorm.Query); ok { gormQuery.SetContext(ctx) } else { // Consider logging a warning or error here } return &Orm{ ctx: ctx, config: r.config, connection: r.connection, query: r.query, queries: r.queries, } }This approach safely handles the type assertions and allows for appropriate error handling or logging if the type is unexpected.
Line range hint
1-136: Summary of ORM implementation changesThe changes to the ORM implementation in
database/orm.gogenerally improve its flexibility and functionality. Key improvements include:
- Use of contract interfaces for better abstraction
- Support for multiple queries and connections
- Addition of a refresh mechanism
However, there are areas that need attention:
- Improve error handling in the
Connectionmethod- Fix potential panics due to unsafe type assertions in
DBandWithContextmethods- Add documentation for the new
Refreshmethod and clarify the usage ofBindingOrmPlease address these issues to enhance the robustness and maintainability of the ORM implementation.
78-82:⚠️ Potential issueFix potential panic in DB method
The type assertion
r.Query().(*gorm.Query)could panic ifr.Query()returns a type that's not*gorm.Query. This issue was previously flagged in a past review.To fix this, use the two-value form of type assertion:
func (r *Orm) DB() (*sql.DB, error) { query, ok := r.Query().(*gorm.Query) if !ok { return nil, fmt.Errorf("unexpected Query type %T, expected *gorm.Query", r.Query()) } return query.Instance().DB() }database/gorm/test_utils.go (21)
82-82: Updated return type tocontractsdatabase.DriverThe
Queriesmethod now returns a map with keys of typecontractsdatabase.Driver, reflecting the updated driver enumeration.
86-86: Updated return type inQueriesOfReadWriteThe
QueriesOfReadWritemethod's return type has been updated to usecontractsdatabase.Driveras the key type. This aligns with the changes made to the driver representations.
115-122: Consistent driver types in returned mapThe returned map now uses
contractsdatabase.Driveras keys, which is consistent with the updated driver package.
157-173: Consistent driver types in returned mapSimilar to previous changes, the map uses
contractsdatabase.Driveras keys for consistency.
181-181: Updated method signature forQueriesWithPrefixAndSingularThe return type now uses
contractsdatabase.Driver, aligning with the updated driver definitions.
192-193: Updatedqueriesmethod and map initializationThe
queriesmethod signature and thedriverToTestQuerymap now usecontractsdatabase.Driver, ensuring consistency across driver type usage.
195-197: Updated driver-to-docker mappingThe
driverToDockermap now correctly usescontractsdatabase.Driveras keys, mapping to the correspondingtesting.DatabaseDriverinstances.
201-202: Conditional inclusion of MySQL and SQL Server driversWhen
TestModelis notTestModelMinimum, the MySQL and SQL Server drivers are added to thedriverToDockermap usingcontractsdatabase.Driver.
223-223: Updated function call togetMockDriverThe call to
getMockDriverreflects the change in function name and encapsulation, moving from an exported to an unexported function.
237-240: Consistent use ofBuildQueryfunctionThe
BuildQueryfunction is called consistently after updating the configuration, ensuring the query object is properly constructed with the new driver settings.
244-244: Proper error handling with informative panic messageThe error handling provides a clear panic message that includes the driver name and the error encountered, aiding in debugging.
276-279: UpdatedQueryOfReadWritemethod implementationThe method now uses
getMockDriverand callsBuildQuerywith the updated driver configuration, ensuring read/write configurations are correctly applied.
286-292: Updated switch cases with new driver typesThe switch cases in
getMockDrivernow usecontractsdatabase.Drivervalues, ensuring alignment with the updated driver definitions.
Line range hint
300-312: UpdatedMockMysqlstruct and constructorThe
MockMysqlstruct now usescontractsdatabase.Driver, and the constructorNewMockMysqlreflects this change, ensuring consistency in driver representation.
Line range hint
371-383: UpdatedMockPostgresstruct and constructorSimilar updates are applied to the
MockPostgresstruct, usingcontractsdatabase.Driverand aligning the constructor accordingly.
Line range hint
441-450: UpdatedMockSqlitestruct and constructorThe struct now correctly references
contractsdatabase.Driver, and the constructorNewMockSqliteis updated to match.
Line range hint
498-510: UpdatedMockSqlserverstruct and constructorThe
MockSqlserverstruct and its constructor now usecontractsdatabase.Driver, maintaining consistency across all mock drivers.
566-569: UpdatedtestTablesstruct andnewTestTablesfunctionThe
testTablesstruct now holds acontractsdatabase.Driver, and thenewTestTablesconstructor reflects this change. This ensures that table creation functions use the correct driver type.
Line range hint
592-625: Correct use of driver types in table creationIn the
peoplestable creation function, the cases now usecontractsdatabase.Driverconstants, ensuring that the correct SQL statements are returned based on the driver.
282-292:⚠️ Potential issueFunction
GetMockDriverrenamed togetMockDriverand unexportedThe function has been unexported by renaming it from
GetMockDrivertogetMockDriver. Verify that this function is not required outside of this package and that external references have been updated accordingly.To check for external references to
GetMockDriver, run:#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for external references to GetMockDriver rg 'GetMockDriver' --type go --glob '!database/gorm/*.go'
232-232:⚠️ Potential issueVariable declaration uses undefined type
*QueryThe variable
queryis declared as*Query, but there is no explicit import or definition shown for theQuerytype. Ensure thatQueryis properly defined or imported in the context.To verify if the
Querytype is correctly defined, you can run:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
database/gorm/dialector_test.go (1)
28-96: LGTM: Comprehensive test cases with a minor suggestionThe test cases are well-structured and cover various scenarios, including both happy and sad paths for different database types. The use of
expectDialectorsfunction for type-specific assertions is a good approach.Consider adding a test case for an unsupported database type to ensure the
getDialectorsfunction handles unexpected inputs gracefully.database/orm.go (5)
15-21: LGTM: Struct changes improve clarity and flexibility.The renaming of
OrmImpltoOrmsimplifies the struct name, which is a good practice. The use ofcontractsorm.Queryinstead of a concrete type improves flexibility and testability.However, the purpose of the new
refreshfield is not immediately clear.Consider adding a comment to explain the purpose and usage of the
refreshfield:type Orm struct { // ... other fields ... // refresh is a function used to update the ORM instance when needed refresh func(key any) }
37-44: LGTM: BuildOrm function is a good addition.The
BuildOrmfunction encapsulates the query building logic, providing a convenient way to create an Orm instance with a new query. This is a good separation of concerns.Consider wrapping the error returned from
NewOrmto provide more context:orm, err := NewOrm(ctx, config, connection, query, refresh) if err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("[Orm] Failed to create new Orm instance: %w", err) } return orm, nil
Line range hint
46-76: LGTM: Connection method changes improve immutability and flexibility.The changes to the
Connectionmethod are well-implemented. Returning a newOrminstance instead of modifying the existing one is a good practice for immutability. The use ofcontractsorm.Ormas the return type improves flexibility.Consider improving error handling when
BuildQueryfails:queue, err := gorm.BuildQuery(r.ctx, r.config, name) if err != nil { color.Red().Printf("[Orm] Init %s connection error: %v\n", name, err) return nil } if queue == nil { color.Red().Printf("[Orm] Init %s connection error: query is nil\n", name) return nil }This separates the error cases and provides more specific error messages.
Line range hint
106-120: LGTM: Transaction method changes improve error handling.The updates to the
Transactionmethod, including the use ofcontractsorm.Queryand improved error handling for rollback, are good improvements. These changes enhance the robustness of the transaction handling.Consider using
errors.Wrapfor better error context:import "github.com/pkg/errors" // ... if err := tx.Rollback(); err != nil { return errors.Wrap(err, "rollback failed") }This provides more context when the error is logged or displayed.
123-140: LGTM: WithContext method changes improve context handling.The updates to the
WithContextmethod, including setting the context for all queries and using type assertions, are good improvements. These changes ensure consistent context handling across different connections and prevent potential panics.Consider logging a warning when a query is not of the expected type:
import "log" // ... for name, query := range r.queries { if gormQuery, ok := query.(*gorm.Query); ok { gormQuery.SetContext(ctx) } else { log.Printf("Warning: Query for connection %s is not of type *gorm.Query", name) } }This would help identify any unexpected query types during development or debugging.
database/gorm/gorm.go (2)
Line range hint
71-92: LGTM with suggestion:configureReadWriteSeparatemethod updated appropriately.The method has been successfully updated to work with
database.FullConfigand utilizes the newgetDialectorsfunction, which suggests a more modular approach. The core logic for configuring read-write separation remains intact and appropriate.Consider extracting the error checking logic for
getDialectorsinto a separate function to reduce repetition:func getDialectorsWithErrorCheck(configs []database.FullConfig) ([]gormio.Dialector, error) { dialectors, err := getDialectors(configs) if err != nil { return nil, err } return dialectors, nil }This would allow you to simplify the
configureReadWriteSeparatemethod:readDialectors, err := getDialectorsWithErrorCheck(readConfigs) if err != nil { return err } writeDialectors, err := getDialectorsWithErrorCheck(writeConfigs) if err != nil { return err }
Line range hint
94-134: LGTM with suggestion:initmethod updated appropriately.The
initmethod has been successfully updated to work withdatabase.FullConfigand utilizes the newgetDialectorsfunction. The naming strategy configuration is correctly updated, and proper error handling has been added for the case of no dialectors found.Consider moving the logger configuration into a separate method to improve readability:
func (r *Builder) configureLogger() gormlogger.Interface { var logLevel gormlogger.LogLevel if r.config.GetBool("app.debug") { logLevel = gormlogger.Info } else { logLevel = gormlogger.Error } logger := NewLogger(log.New(os.Stdout, "\r\n", log.LstdFlags), gormlogger.Config{ SlowThreshold: 200 * time.Millisecond, LogLevel: gormlogger.Info, IgnoreRecordNotFoundError: true, Colorful: true, }) return logger.LogMode(logLevel) }Then in the
initmethod, you can simply call:logger := r.configureLogger()This would make the
initmethod more focused and easier to read.database/db/configs_test.go (1)
107-232: Excellent test coverage with room for minor improvementThe
TestFillDefaultfunction demonstrates a well-structured, table-driven approach to testing multiple scenarios. The test cases provide comprehensive coverage for various situations, including empty configs, configs with empty keys, and different database drivers.To further enhance the test structure:
- Consider extracting the common mock setup logic into a helper function to reduce repetition across test cases.
- You might want to add a brief comment before each test case in the table to explain the specific scenario being tested, improving readability for future maintainers.
Overall, the test structure is clear, easy to understand, and provides excellent coverage of the
fillDefaultmethod.database/gorm/query.go (1)
1510-1512: Ensure safe type assertion ingetModelConnectionfunctionIn the
getModelConnectionfunction, the type assertion tocontractsorm.ConnectionModelis performed without checking ifnewModel.Interface()is not nil. To prevent potential panics, consider checking ifnewModel.Interface()is not nil before performing the type assertion.Apply this diff to add a nil check:
connectionModelInterface := newModel.Interface() +if connectionModelInterface == nil { + return "", nil +} connectionModel, ok := connectionModelInterface.(contractsorm.ConnectionModel) if !ok { return "", nil }This ensures that the function safely handles cases where the interface is nil.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
mocks/database/ConfigBuilder.gois excluded by!mocks/**
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- contracts/database/config.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migrate.go (5 hunks)
- database/db/configs.go (1 hunks)
- database/db/configs_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/gorm/dialector.go (1 hunks)
- database/gorm/dialector_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/gorm/gorm.go (5 hunks)
- database/gorm/query.go (61 hunks)
- database/orm.go (5 hunks)
- foundation/container_test.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- contracts/database/config.go
- database/console/migrate.go
- database/db/configs.go
- foundation/container_test.go
🔇 Additional comments (35)
database/gorm/dialector.go (6)
12-13: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate.The new import statements are necessary for the refactored implementation and there are no unused imports.
16-16: LGTM: Function signature is well-defined.The
getDialectorsfunction signature is appropriate for its purpose. It correctly takes a slice ofdatabase.FullConfigas input and returns a slice ofgorm.Dialectoralong with an error. The function is not exported, which aligns with the previous suggestion to keep it as an internal function.
19-24: LGTM: Main loop implementation is correct and efficient.The main loop correctly iterates over the configs to create dialectors. The DSN generation and error handling for empty DSN are well-implemented. The error message for empty DSN has been improved as suggested in the previous review.
44-47: LGTM: Final part of the function is correctly implemented.The created dialector is properly appended to the slice, and the function correctly returns the slice of dialectors along with a nil error when successful.
26-42:⚠️ Potential issueImprove error message for unsupported database drivers.
The switch statement correctly handles the creation of dialectors for supported database drivers. However, the error message in the default case could be improved for clarity and grammar.
Apply this diff to enhance the error message:
- return nil, fmt.Errorf("err database driver: %s, only support mysql, postgres, sqlite and sqlserver", config.Driver) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("unsupported database driver '%s'; supported drivers are mysql, postgres, sqlite, and sqlserver", config.Driver)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
16-47: LGTM: Excellent refactoring of the dialector creation logic.The
getDialectorsfunction effectively replaces the previousDialectorinterface andDialectorImplstruct, consolidating the logic for creating dialectors for different database types. This refactoring has simplified the code and improved maintainability while adhering to Go best practices and SOLID principles.To ensure the changes don't have unintended consequences, please run the following script to verify the usage of the old
Dialectorinterface andDialectorImplstruct:✅ Verification successful
Verified: The old
Dialectorinterface andDialectorImplstruct are no longer used in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the old Dialector interface and DialectorImpl struct are no longer used in the codebase. # Test: Search for usage of Dialector interface echo "Searching for Dialector interface usage:" rg --type go "type\s+Dialector\s+interface" # Test: Search for usage of DialectorImpl struct echo "Searching for DialectorImpl struct usage:" rg --type go "type\s+DialectorImpl\s+struct" # Test: Search for NewDialectorImpl function usage echo "Searching for NewDialectorImpl function usage:" rg --type go "NewDialectorImpl\(" # If any of these searches return results, it may indicate that some parts of the codebase still rely on the old implementation and need to be updated.Length of output: 415
database/gorm/dialector_test.go (4)
Line range hint
1-15: LGTM: Import statements updated appropriatelyThe import statements have been updated to reflect the new testing approach. The removal of the
testify/suiteimport and the addition oftestify/assertandgoravel/framework/contracts/databaseimports are consistent with the shift from a test suite to table-driven tests.
17-27: LGTM: Well-structured table-driven testsThe new
TestGetDialectorsfunction implements a table-driven test approach, which is an excellent practice for testing multiple scenarios efficiently. This structure allows for easy addition of new test cases and improves the overall maintainability of the test suite.
99-111: LGTM: Well-implemented test executionThe test execution structure is well-implemented:
- Using a for loop to iterate through test cases is efficient.
- Running each test case as a subtest (t.Run()) provides clear and organized test output.
- The assertions using testify/assert are appropriate and easy to understand.
- The error comparison now uses assert.EqualError, addressing a previous review comment.
This implementation ensures good test isolation and clear failure messages.
Line range hint
1-111: Excellent refactoring of the test suiteThe complete rewrite of this test file is a significant improvement:
- The shift to table-driven tests enhances maintainability and readability.
- Test cases are comprehensive, covering various scenarios for different database types.
- The new structure allows for easy addition of new test cases.
- Previous review comments have been addressed, particularly the use of
assert.EqualError.These changes result in a more robust and maintainable test suite. Great job on the refactoring!
database/orm.go (6)
9-10: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate.The addition of the
contractsormimport and the update to the gorm package import align well with the refactoring changes made throughout the file. These changes contribute to better separation of concerns and improved modularity.
24-35: LGTM: NewOrm function changes are consistent and well-structured.The renaming of
NewOrmImpltoNewOrmis consistent with the struct renaming. The addition of therefreshparameter and its assignment to the struct field is appropriate. The initialization of thequeriesmap with the provided query is a good practice for maintaining the connection state.
78-85: LGTM: DB method changes improve type safety.The addition of the type assertion and error handling in the
DBmethod is a good improvement. It prevents potential panics that could occur if the underlying query is not of the expected type. This change enhances the robustness of the code.
87-100: LGTM: Method signature updates are consistent.The updates to the
Query,Factory, andObservemethods to usecontractsorminterfaces are consistent with the overall refactoring. These changes improve the flexibility and testability of the code without altering the core logic of the methods.
102-104: Please provide more context for the Refresh method.The purpose and usage of the
Refreshmethod are not immediately clear. Additionally, theBindingOrmargument is not defined in this file.Could you please provide more information about:
- The purpose of the
Refreshmethod?- The definition and significance of
BindingOrm?- When and how this method is intended to be used?
Consider adding a comment to explain these points:
// Refresh updates the ORM instance using the provided refresh function. // It uses BindingOrm as a key to identify which binding to refresh. func (r *Orm) Refresh() { r.refresh(BindingOrm) }
Line range hint
1-140: Overall, the changes in this file are well-implemented and improve the ORM functionality.The refactoring to use contract interfaces enhances the flexibility and testability of the code. Error handling improvements contribute to the robustness of the implementation. The new
BuildOrmfunction and the changes to theConnectionmethod are particularly noteworthy improvements.However, there are a few areas that could benefit from further attention:
- The purpose and usage of the new
Refreshmethod need clarification.- Some methods could benefit from more detailed error handling or logging.
- Additional documentation for new or significantly changed methods would improve code maintainability.
These minor improvements aside, the changes represent a significant step forward in the ORM implementation.
database/gorm/gorm.go (6)
16-16: LGTM: New import aligns with restructuring.The addition of the
databasecontract import is consistent with the changes made to the GORM implementation structure.
20-23: LGTM: NewBuilderstruct improves encapsulation.The
Builderstruct effectively encapsulates the necessary components for constructing a GORM instance. The use ofdatabase.ConfigBuildersuggests a more flexible and maintainable approach to configuration.
26-32: LGTM: ImprovedNewGormfunction signature and implementation.The new
NewGormfunction simplifies the interface by using aConfigBuilderand returns(*gormio.DB, error)directly, which is more idiomatic Go. The implementation is concise and clear, effectively delegating the build process to theBuilderstruct.
Line range hint
35-53: LGTM: Well-structuredBuildmethod.The
Buildmethod effectively orchestrates the GORM instance creation process. It uses theconfigBuilderto retrieve configurations, and follows a clear step-by-step approach with appropriate error handling. The method successfully replaces the functionality of the previousMakemethod while improving readability and maintainability.
Line range hint
57-69: LGTM:configurePoolmethod adapted correctly.The
configurePoolmethod has been successfully adapted to work with the newBuilderstruct. The implementation remains sound, correctly configuring the connection pool using configuration values with appropriate default fallbacks.
Line range hint
1-134: Overall assessment: Significant improvements to GORM implementation structure.The changes in this file represent a substantial improvement to the GORM implementation structure. The introduction of the
Builderpattern, along with the use ofdatabase.ConfigBuilderanddatabase.FullConfig, provides better encapsulation and flexibility. Error handling has been enhanced, and the code is generally more modular and maintainable.The refactoring aligns well with the PR objective of removing the "wire" component, as it simplifies the initialization process and consolidates configuration handling. These changes should make the codebase more robust and easier to maintain going forward.
Great job on this refactoring! The code quality has notably improved.
database/db/configs_test.go (5)
1-18: LGTM: Proper package structure and importsThe package declaration, imports, and struct definition are well-organized and appropriate for the test suite. The necessary dependencies are correctly imported, and the
ConfigTestSuitestruct is properly defined with the required fields.
20-29: LGTM: Proper test suite setupThe
TestConfigTestSuitefunction serves as a good entry point for running the test suite. TheSetupTestmethod correctly initializes the mock config and config builder before each test, following best practices for test suite setup.
31-60: Comprehensive test cases with potential for refactoringThe
TestReadsfunction provides thorough coverage of theReadsmethod, testing both empty and non-empty config scenarios. The mock expectations are well-defined and cover all necessary calls.However, as mentioned in a previous review comment, there's an opportunity to refactor the repeated mock setup code into helper functions. This would improve maintainability and reduce code duplication across multiple test methods.
62-105: Comprehensive test cases with repeated refactoring opportunityThe
TestWritesfunction provides thorough coverage of theWritesmethod, testing both empty and non-empty config builder scenarios. The mock expectations are well-defined and cover all necessary calls.As with the
TestReadsfunction, there's an opportunity to refactor the repeated mock setup code into helper functions. This would improve maintainability and reduce code duplication across multiple test methods.
1-232: Overall excellent test coverage with minor improvement suggestionsThis test file provides comprehensive coverage for the
ConfigBuilderfunctionality. The test cases are well-structured, cover various scenarios, and use appropriate testing techniques such as table-driven tests.To further enhance the quality and maintainability of the test suite:
- Consider refactoring repeated mock setup code into helper functions across all test methods.
- Add brief comments to explain specific scenarios in table-driven tests.
These minor improvements will make the already high-quality test suite even more maintainable and easier to understand for future developers.
Great job on creating a thorough and well-structured test suite!
database/gorm/query.go (8)
18-19: Updated import statements to reflect package refactoringThe imports for
contractsdatabaseandcontractsormhave been added, aligning with the refactoring to remove the dependency on thewirepackage. This ensures that the code uses the correct contracts from the updated packages.
26-32: Note on potential concurrent access toqueriesmapAs previously mentioned, the
queriesmap in theQuerystruct may not be safe for concurrent access if instances ofQueryare used from multiple goroutines. Ensure that appropriate synchronization mechanisms are in place to prevent data races.
35-41: Initialization ofqueriesmap inNewQueryconstructorThe
queriesmap is correctly initialized in theNewQueryconstructor. This prepares the map for storing query instances associated with different connections.
51-58: Creation ofBuildQueryfunctionThe
BuildQueryfunction provides a convenient way to build a newQueryinstance with the given context, configuration, and connection. This enhances the modularity and reusability of the code.
178-178: Correct implementation ofDrivermethodThe
Drivermethod correctly returns the database driver by casting the dialector name tocontractsdatabase.Driver. This ensures compatibility with the updatedcontractsdatabasepackage.
542-551: Note on handling unsupported drivers inInRandomOrdermethodAs previously mentioned, consider adding a default case to handle unsupported or unknown drivers in the
InRandomOrdermethod. This can prevent unintended behavior if a new driver is added or an unsupported driver is used.
Line range hint
1309-1327: Potential data race when accessingqueriesmap concurrentlyIn the
refreshConnectionmethod, thequeriesmap is accessed and modified. If instances ofQueryare used from multiple goroutines, this could lead to data races. Consider using a thread-safe data structure likesync.Mapor adding synchronization mechanisms such as a mutex to protect concurrent access to thequeriesmap.
1539-1559: Switch statement ingetObserverEventcovers all event typesThe
getObserverEventfunction includes cases for all definedEventTypevalues, returning the corresponding observer methods. The lack of a default case is acceptable here because all possible enum values are covered. Ensure that any new event types added in the future are also handled in this switch statement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
database/gorm/dialector.go (1)
22-24: Enhance error message for empty DSNThe error message for an empty DSN could be more informative. Consider including the connection name in the error message for easier debugging.
Apply this diff to improve the error message:
- return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to generate DSN for connection: %s", config.Connection) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to generate DSN for connection '%s'", config.Connection)database/gorm/dialector_test.go (1)
28-96: LGTM: Comprehensive test cases with a suggestionThe test cases cover a good range of scenarios, including both error cases and successful cases for different database types. This ensures that the
getDialectorsfunction is thoroughly tested.Consider adding a test case for an unsupported database driver to ensure the function handles unexpected inputs gracefully.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- database/gorm/dialector.go (1 hunks)
- database/gorm/dialector_test.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
database/gorm/dialector.go (4)
Line range hint
1-15: LGTM: Import statements are appropriateThe import statements have been updated to reflect the new implementation. All imports are necessary and there are no unused imports.
16-16: LGTM: Function signature is appropriate and addresses previous feedbackThe
getDialectorsfunction signature is well-designed for its purpose. It takes a slice of database configurations and returns a slice of GORM dialectors along with a potential error. The function is correctly unexported, addressing the previous review comment about considering unexporting the function.
16-48: LGTM: Overall implementation is efficient and well-structuredThe
getDialectorsfunction efficiently consolidates the logic for creating dialectors for different database types. It handles multiple configurations and returns a slice of dialectors, which is a good approach for supporting multiple database connections. The implementation is concise and addresses the needs of the refactoring by removing the previousDialectorinterface andDialectorImplstruct.
26-42:⚠️ Potential issueImprove switch statement and error handling for unsupported drivers
The switch statement could benefit from a
defaultcase to handle unsupported drivers more explicitly. Additionally, the error message for unsupported drivers could be more clear and grammatically correct.Apply this diff to improve the switch statement and error message:
switch config.Driver { case database.DriverMysql: dialector = mysql.New(mysql.Config{ DSN: dsn, }) case database.DriverPostgres: dialector = postgres.New(postgres.Config{ DSN: dsn, }) case database.DriverSqlite: dialector = sqlite.Open(dsn) case database.DriverSqlserver: dialector = sqlserver.New(sqlserver.Config{ DSN: dsn, }) default: - return nil, fmt.Errorf("err database driver: %s, only support mysql, postgres, sqlite and sqlserver", config.Driver) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("unsupported database driver '%s'; supported drivers are mysql, postgres, sqlite, and sqlserver", config.Driver) }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
database/gorm/dialector_test.go (5)
Line range hint
1-15: LGTM: Import statements are appropriateThe import statements include all necessary packages for testing and database drivers. The use of the
assertpackage fromtestifyis a good choice for writing clear and concise test assertions.
17-27: LGTM: Well-structured table-driven testThe
TestGetDialectorsfunction uses a table-driven test approach, which is an excellent practice for testing multiple scenarios efficiently. The structure of the test cases is clear and includes all necessary information for each test.
99-111: LGTM: Well-implemented test execution loopThe test execution loop is well-structured, using
t.Runfor each test case, which allows for clear separation and identification of individual test results. The assertions are appropriate for both error cases and successful dialector creation cases.
102-109: LGTM: Appropriate assertions with previous comment addressedThe assertions in the test execution loop are well-chosen:
assert.EqualErroris correctly used for error cases, addressing the previous comment about comparing error messages.assert.NoError,assert.Len, andassert.Trueare appropriately used for successful cases.This ensures that both error handling and successful dialector creation are properly verified.
Line range hint
1-111: LGTM: Excellent refactoring of dialector testsThis refactoring of the dialector tests represents a significant improvement:
- The table-driven test approach enhances readability and maintainability.
- Test cases cover multiple scenarios, including error cases and different database types.
- Assertions are appropriate and address previous comments.
- The overall structure is clean and follows good testing practices.
These changes will make it easier to maintain and extend the tests in the future. Great job on improving the test quality!
📑 Description
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ConfigBuilderfor managing database configurations with methods for reading and writing configurations.Refactor
Dialectorimplementation to simplify the creation of GORM dialectors.✅ Checks