[Do not merge] Test pull-request for issue #169.

[gendx]

This is a test for the behavior in #169. This pull request can be removed and #169 marked as fixed once the GitHub checks fail here.

• Tests pass
• Appropriate changes to README are included in PR

[kaczmarczyck]

@gendx Is this still uesful to be kept open as a canary?

[gendx]

@gendx Is this still uesful to be kept open as a canary?

Just rebased this pull request to see if the Clippy workflow now fails.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 41.891% when pulling 951a310 on gendx:issue-169 into c1f2551 on google:develop.

[jmichelp]

Anyway, due to recent changes on Github, the workflow for Clippy must be adjusted for it to work properly. It now must be split into 2 workflows: an untrusted one which analyses the PR and produces a structured file with the results and a trusted one which takes this file and creates the annotations.

[gendx]

Looks like the current workflow passed instead of denying the lint, so leaving this PR open until #169 is fixed.

[kaczmarczyck]

This PR does not work with the current CI, since crypto was excluded from clippy. I verified that CI fails when I add a let-and-return in the opensk library.