Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for additional model name prefixes #98

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

andrewheard
Copy link
Collaborator

@andrewheard andrewheard commented Jan 30, 2024

  • Future-proofed the SDK to support additional model name prefixes (e.g., myPrefix/ in addition to models/)
    • If no prefix is provided then the default models/ prefix will be prepended (e.g., "gemini-pro" is equivalent to "models/gemini-pro")

@github-actions github-actions bot added component:swift sdk Issue/PR related to Swift SDK status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer labels Jan 30, 2024
@andrewheard andrewheard requested a review from paulb777 January 30, 2024 16:59
Copy link
Collaborator

@paulb777 paulb777 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to go for this week's release

@andrewheard andrewheard changed the title Add support for tuned model resource names Add support for additional model resource name prefixes Feb 13, 2024
@andrewheard andrewheard changed the title Add support for additional model resource name prefixes Add support for additional model name prefixes Feb 13, 2024
@andrewheard andrewheard merged commit d60695f into main Feb 13, 2024
8 checks passed
@andrewheard andrewheard deleted the ah/tuned-models branch February 13, 2024 15:29
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer label Feb 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:swift sdk Issue/PR related to Swift SDK
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants