Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement holistic landmarker example #302

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Jan 4, 2024

Description

This pull request adds a new holistic landmarker API

Checklist

Please ensure the following items are complete before submitting a pull request:

  • My code follows the code style of the project.
  • I have updated the documentation (if applicable).

Type of Change

Please check the relevant option below:

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Screenshots

screenshot

@ghost ghost marked this pull request as ready for review January 5, 2024 09:58
@PaulTR
Copy link
Collaborator

PaulTR commented Jan 5, 2024

Hey Duy, what are the classification rows (right above the inference time drawer) for with this one?

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jan 5, 2024

Hey Duy, what are the classification rows (right above the inference time drawer) for with this one?

This is "FaceBlendshapes". A list categories like eyelookDownLeft, mounthPressRight etc...

@PaulTR
Copy link
Collaborator

PaulTR commented Jan 5, 2024

Ah cool, OK. I think we can get rid of that for this one since we demo it in the face landmarker sample. It'll keep things a little more simple at a glance. @gustheman can you review the code and run the app? Thanks!

@PaulTR PaulTR assigned PaulTR and unassigned gustheman Mar 19, 2024
@PaulTR
Copy link
Collaborator

PaulTR commented Mar 25, 2024

Closing since #355 will cover now.

@PaulTR PaulTR closed this Mar 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants