-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gi.ts rework & merge #144
gi.ts rework & merge #144
Conversation
I'm working on merging the I used |
Yay I'll have a look when I find the time. Shall we delete branch 4.x for this and create a new one? |
@JumpLink I think it'd be best to create a new branch off of |
@ewlsh I have now recreated the I start by fixing the current merge conflicts |
#148 solves the current merge conflicts and continued the general work. Can be merged at any time into this PR if you want to continue working on it, I would then create another PR to help further, but don't wait for me as my available time is currently limited. |
Bumps [ip](https://github.com/indutny/node-ip) from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1. - [Commits](indutny/node-ip@v2.0.0...v2.0.1) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: ip dependency-type: indirect ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
2158fee
to
5c5475c
Compare
temp: actual lib updates
This merges the sources from @gi.ts/lib (newlib) into the lib package.
d92f509
to
db33289
Compare
Also opaque records which have constructors should not be abstract.
This is the second attempt at merging the two codebases, it is still a draft but it is generating types with only a few failures to debug 🥳