Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update tree-sitter-javascript from 0.20.3 to 0.20.4 #448

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2024
Merged

Update tree-sitter-javascript from 0.20.3 to 0.20.4 #448

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2024

Conversation

NinoScript
Copy link
Contributor

@NinoScript NinoScript commented Jul 1, 2024 •
edited
Loading

All tests passed with the newer version, no changes were needed

This would close #449 #447

@NinoScript NinoScript requested a review from a team as a code owner July 1, 2024 22:25
@NinoScript NinoScript mentioned this pull request Jul 1, 2024
Open
hendrikvanantwerpen
hendrikvanantwerpen approved these changes Jul 2, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@hendrikvanantwerpen hendrikvanantwerpen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@hendrikvanantwerpen hendrikvanantwerpen merged commit 20a2554 into github:main Jul 2, 2024
8 checks passed
@hendrikvanantwerpen hendrikvanantwerpen mentioned this pull request Jul 2, 2024
Closed
@NinoScript NinoScript deleted the update-tree-sitter-javascript branch July 2, 2024 13:07
@NinoScript
Copy link
Contributor Author

NinoScript commented Jul 2, 2024 •
edited
Loading

I mentioned the wrong issue (#449 instead of #447) and it seems it got closed automatically because of this, oops.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hendrikvanantwerpen hendrikvanantwerpen hendrikvanantwerpen approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@NinoScript @hendrikvanantwerpen