Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update tree-sitter-java from 0.20.0 to 0.20.2 #442

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

Update tree-sitter-java from 0.20.0 to 0.20.2 #442

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

NinoScript
Copy link
Contributor

Version 0.20.2 of tree-sitter-java introduces the condition expression in if_statement:

(if_statement
-   condition: (parenthesized_expression)
+   condition: (condition)
    consequence: (block)
    alternative: (block)
)

It seems to be the only breaking change, all tests pass with this update.
If merged, this PR would close #441

@NinoScript NinoScript requested a review from a team as a code owner June 29, 2024 00:58
hendrikvanantwerpen
hendrikvanantwerpen approved these changes Jul 1, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@hendrikvanantwerpen hendrikvanantwerpen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for contributing this PR!

@hendrikvanantwerpen hendrikvanantwerpen merged commit a66702f into github:main Jul 1, 2024
8 checks passed
@NinoScript NinoScript deleted the update-tree-sitter-java branch July 1, 2024 13:19
@NinoScript NinoScript mentioned this pull request Jul 1, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hendrikvanantwerpen hendrikvanantwerpen hendrikvanantwerpen approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update tree-sitter-java dependency to 0.20.2
2 participants
@NinoScript @hendrikvanantwerpen