You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 31, 2020. It is now read-only.
I am trying to understand the definition of NTLEN in the pindel vcf output. The header says that it is: "Number of bases inserted in place of deleted code". It makes sense for RPL variants where a chunk of bases are deleted and a sequence is inserted.
However, in duplications based on the figure 2e: http://gmt.genome.wustl.edu/packages/pindel/new-development.png in Pindel's user manual, it looks like its just an inserted sequence between reference and duplicated sequence. There isnt anything deleted here. So, this definition seems applicable only to RPL variants and not when we observe non template sequence for duplicated events. I just wanted to clarify so that I am not missing anything.
Thank you.
Ashini
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hi,
I am trying to understand the definition of NTLEN in the pindel vcf output. The header says that it is: "Number of bases inserted in place of deleted code". It makes sense for RPL variants where a chunk of bases are deleted and a sequence is inserted.
However, in duplications based on the figure 2e: http://gmt.genome.wustl.edu/packages/pindel/new-development.png in Pindel's user manual, it looks like its just an inserted sequence between reference and duplicated sequence. There isnt anything deleted here. So, this definition seems applicable only to RPL variants and not when we observe non template sequence for duplicated events. I just wanted to clarify so that I am not missing anything.
Thank you.
Ashini
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: