Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added arch #287

Conversation

sssash18
Copy link

@sssash18 sssash18 commented Jan 11, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:

Added architecture field in the node template

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #122

Special notes for your reviewer:
Release note:

Added machine cpu architecture support for scale-from-zero scenarios.

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Jan 11, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 11, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 11, 2024
@sssash18 sssash18 marked this pull request as draft January 12, 2024 05:20
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 18, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 19, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 19, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Apr 16, 2024
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added size/xl Size of pull request is huge (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else and removed size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Apr 16, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Apr 16, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Apr 16, 2024
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the size/s Size of pull request is small (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) label Jun 4, 2024
@gardener-robot gardener-robot removed the size/xl Size of pull request is huge (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) label Jun 4, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jun 4, 2024
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) and removed size/s Size of pull request is small (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Jun 4, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jun 4, 2024
@sssash18 sssash18 marked this pull request as ready for review June 11, 2024 05:37
Copy link

@aaronfern aaronfern left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please add appropriate release note?

Copy link

@rishabh-11 rishabh-11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else labels Jul 16, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jul 16, 2024
@sssash18
Copy link
Author

Can you please add appropriate release note?

done

@rishabh-11 rishabh-11 merged commit 2f7cf88 into gardener:machine-controller-manager-provider Jul 16, 2024
10 checks passed
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Jul 16, 2024
@rishabh-11 rishabh-11 deleted the enh/arch_node_templates branch August 12, 2024 03:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enhance node template to include Architecture
7 participants