-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ability to align against a multi-contig construct #56
Comments
Why not use the sequence dictionary ( I am tempted to do this by convention, for example, use the There's no reason we cannot instead have lower case tags to denote this information. Thoughts? |
That could work. I am okay with stipulating that at least one of the following must be true for entries in the dict with the same
Circularity is a bit less clear. We could assume that if any contig in the construct has |
We could also just have “current index” and “next index”? |
That works - takes care of both ordering and circularity. I do think we should also have a default interpretation when there are multiple sequences with the same |
Often, multiple contigs in the reference fasta will belong to the same construct (such as a viral vector or plasmid). It would be nice if there were a way to describe the ordering of the component contigs in a construct, and annotate a construct as circular (so that jumps from the end of the last construct to the beginning of the first would have zero cost).
I can think of a number of ways to do this (comma-delimited list of contigs on the command line; custom format text or JSON file) but would prefer a standardized format if one exists. Maybe GFA?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: