docs: fix #104

[nh13]

Fixed #104

[tfenne]

@nh13 Sorry - I didn't see this before I fixed up my PR and merged it to dev. Would you mind rebasing please?

[tfenne]

Thanks for fixing this. I'd seen examples online where the triple-backticks weren't necessary, but I wonder if that's just wrong or a sphinx vs. mkdocs thing.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.32%. Comparing base (a40056b) to head (bcccc06).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #111   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.32%   97.32%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines        1642     1642           
  Branches      195      195           
=======================================
  Hits         1598     1598           
  Misses         26       26           
  Partials       18       18           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.