Implement upload portal for missouri and mississippi court opinions #4034
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
add summary to cluster in make_objects
…ssissippi-court-opinions
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
…ssissippi-court-opinions
…ssissippi-court-opinions
flooie
reviewed
May 9, 2024
flooie
reviewed
May 9, 2024
…ssissippi-court-opinions
…ssissippi-court-opinions
…ssissippi-court-opinions
…ssissippi-court-opinions
…ssissippi-court-opinions
update make_objects function update BaseCourtUploadForm
…ssissippi-court-opinions
…ssissippi-court-opinions
… court of appeals (with temporary ids for the new courts)
…-missouri-mississippi-court-opinions' into 3996-implement-upload-portal-for-missouri-mississippi-court-opinions
…ssissippi-court-opinions
use seal rookery to load seals on court pages court homepage display results using elasticsearch or solr make court home page view sync instead of async to verify if elastic search is enabled or not move download url field to a function
…lement-upload-portal-for-missouri-mississippi-court-opinions # Conflicts: # poetry.lock # pyproject.toml
|
@flooie the changes are ready
|
flooie
reviewed
Jun 18, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Jun 18, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Jun 18, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Jun 18, 2024
…lement-upload-portal-for-missouri-mississippi-court-opinions # Conflicts: # poetry.lock
remove moctapp from views remove unused download_url field from ordering make court_homepage async again fix merge conflict poetry.lock
|
The changes are ready @flooie
|
…ssissippi-court-opinions
…ssissippi-court-opinions
flooie
reviewed
Jun 25, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Jun 25, 2024
Do some minor whitespace cleanup for html files
…ourt-opinions' of https://github.com/freelawproject/courtlistener into 3996-implement-upload-portal-for-missouri-mississippi-court-opinions
flooie
reviewed
Jun 25, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Jun 25, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Jun 25, 2024
remove unused appeal_from_str param from update_or_create_docket function remove print message
…ssissippi-court-opinions
flooie
deleted the
3996-implement-upload-portal-for-missouri-mississippi-court-opinions
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These are the implementations for the upload portal for mo, moctapp, miss and missctapp.
Based on what I saw on their sites, i define the following fields for the forms: caption, docket number, publication date, optional lead author and pdf file, only for Mississippi a summary field is required. I didn't find that they had neutral citations like maine or tennessee.
The information I added about the courts was extracted from their pages
I added a back button in the form and an asterisk to indicate required fields.
Tennessee and Maine maintain the same functionality, they just use the same base form.
miss fields:
missctapp fields:
mo fields:
moctapp fields:
Steps:
Add the new courts to courtlistener:
Add new user groups and assign users to the groups: