Bug missing prefix #14
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is done before I make any content-wise changes, so as to avoid unclear merge requests in the future.
…arations. This may result in fewer bugs where a specific prefix declaration is missing from a specific function (see previous commit).
This approach avoids unnecessarily repeating the variable whose bound state is checked.
…hroughout the file.
…erties. These improved versions are more robust against incorrect input, e.g. things like zero or negative indices (rdf:_-1) and leading zero's (rdf:_01) now return as unbound.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.