Skip to content

⚡ Fossum model for carrier lifetime #2231

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

⚡ Fossum model for carrier lifetime #2231

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2025

Conversation

marc-flex
Copy link
Contributor

@marc-flex marc-flex commented Feb 7, 2025

  • Added Fossum model for carrier lifetime
  • Split reference doping into n and p dopings (CaugheyThomasMobility)

This is the only thing that needed to be added to the front-end to improve the 2D results.

FYI: There will soon be a back-end PR associated to this plus some other fixes

@marc-flex marc-flex self-assigned this Feb 7, 2025
@marc-flex marc-flex force-pushed the marc/fossum branch 2 times, most recently from 8a0d539 to 8099b78 Compare February 7, 2025 16:50
Copy link
Collaborator

@daquinteroflex daquinteroflex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good!

Copy link
Collaborator

@momchil-flex momchil-flex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but for my understanding where exactly do the specific values come from in the two separate mobility models now?

@marc-flex
Copy link
Contributor Author

where exactly do the specific values come from in the two separate mobility models now?

The Fossum parameters can be found in the original paper by Fossum et al. The mobility model is basically the same model as before but by splitting up the entry into n and p we avoid having to duplicate naming (e.g., mu_n, mu_p)

I'll add some references.

@marc-flex
Copy link
Contributor Author

@momchil-flex @daquinteroflex if you both are OK with this I'll merge by the end of the day

@daquinteroflex
Copy link
Collaborator

Makes sense to me!

@marc-flex marc-flex merged commit ff869bc into pre/2.8 Feb 11, 2025
14 checks passed
@marc-flex marc-flex deleted the marc/fossum branch February 11, 2025 16:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants