Skip to content

fix: write catalog landing page from a customer pov #132

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dabasvibhor
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Deploy Preview for canarychecker ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 81c0268
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/canarychecker/deploys/65a0eacb9c9e970008d53f81
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-132--canarychecker.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Deploy Preview for flanksource-docs failed.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 81c0268
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/flanksource-docs/deploys/65a0eacbd1c4cd0008616572

@dabasvibhor dabasvibhor requested a review from moshloop January 12, 2024 07:31
@moshloop
Copy link
Member

Comment on lines +148 to +152
| Field | Description | Scheme | Required |
| ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------- | -------- |
| `name` | The label with the name of the relative | `string` | Yes |
| `namespace` | The label with the namespace of the relative | `string` | Yes |
| `kind` | The resource type of the relative | `string` | Yes |
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Relationships table appears incomplete. The example YAML shows both expr and value fields being used, but these aren't documented in the table. Also, the table marks all fields as required (Yes), while the main table shows relationships as optional. These inconsistencies should be resolved to match the actual implementation.

Spotted by Graphite Reviewer

Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants