Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rexi updated #423

Open
wants to merge 57 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Rexi updated #423

wants to merge 57 commits into from

Conversation

jshipton
Copy link
Contributor

@jshipton jshipton commented Aug 15, 2023

This contains code to compute the exponential of the linear operator defined by linearising an equation.

The code is tested for shallow water and compressible Boussinesq and there are also some tests for the REXI approximation.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@jshipton jshipton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nhartney could you update the checkpoint data file to contain known correct output from REXI so that we can then make the test tolerances smaller? Thanks!

@tommbendall tommbendall added enhancement Pull requests or issues relating to adding a new capability research problem Pull requests or issues involving new science, with possibly unknown outcome labels Aug 7, 2024
@tommbendall tommbendall marked this pull request as ready for review November 1, 2024 14:40
Copy link
Contributor

@tommbendall tommbendall left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am happy with everything here -- we just need to merge in main and resolve conflicts

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ class GustoIOError(IOError):
pass


def pick_up_mesh(output, mesh_name):
def pick_up_mesh(output, mesh_name, comm=COMM_WORLD):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We had a brief chat about the addition of the comm argument here last week -- this makes sense to me now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Pull requests or issues relating to adding a new capability research problem Pull requests or issues involving new science, with possibly unknown outcome
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants