Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[bad PR] #90

Closed
wants to merge 103 commits into from
Closed

[bad PR] #90

wants to merge 103 commits into from

Conversation

leoschwarz
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Aleksejs Fomins and others added 30 commits April 4, 2024 15:20
Co-authored-by: Leonardo Schwarz <[email protected]>
… added dict-sorting by key feature for easier comparison of Zeep and Suds
aleksejs-fomins and others added 28 commits April 23, 2024 15:59
Handle default `None` parameters in BfabricConfig
… endpoints. extended use BfabricRequestError to correctly handle bad delete queries and multiple responses
- This migrates the project configuration to `pyproject.toml`.
- In a next step we can update the folder structure as well.
- Scripts can be added once we add a `main` function to them, which will be done in separate PRs.
The code itself has not been changed, nor does it use the new API.
Refactor list not available proteomics workunits
- Use `uv`
- Adds:
  - Code style (does not need to pass)
  - License check
- Make managing the `BfabricAuth` object the responsibility of the `Bfabric` class. This allows us to implement the contextmanager, which will be useful for the REST-proxy server.
  - Notably this shouldn't change anything about code that already uses the new class.
- Rename `BfabricConfig.with_overrides` to `BfabricConfig.copy_with` for clarity.
- Some unit tests for the Bfabric class, I will add more as I go.
- New pagination logic:
  - Specify max number of items
  - Specify offset of items to skip
- Stable reading
  - Reading passes a `createdbefore` query field (if it's not part of the query) to ensure consistent reads/pagination in the presence of insertions into the database. Deletions are not handled and might require an API feature.
  - It will need to be tested further before releasing, but my idea is that this is a lot more flexible moving forward
- New `Bfabric.from_config` arguably it is a bit redundant with the `get_system_auth` method, however I do feel like 99% of use cases will be handled with this method now and it will be easier to do so. I'm not changing the usage in this PR yet.
@leoschwarz leoschwarz closed this May 7, 2024
@leoschwarz leoschwarz changed the title Refactor save scripts [bad PR] May 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants