Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use correct conditional for status #146

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 18, 2023
Merged

Conversation

EthnTuttle
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@EthnTuttle
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closes #122

Copy link
Collaborator

@wbobeirne wbobeirne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My mistake for approving the last PR without thoroughly checking, ideally this would actually check the role of the peer but incidentally I think this works because this table only renders once you have approved, but I could see this being error-prone if we ever decided to render the peer table before that. But for now this fixes the incorrect implementation 👌

@EthnTuttle EthnTuttle merged commit 93199b9 into master Aug 18, 2023
1 check passed
@wbobeirne wbobeirne deleted the role-conditional branch December 14, 2023 16:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants