-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
wip: update(ci): use CNCF oracle gh runners #2200
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
wip: update(ci): use CNCF oracle gh runners #2200
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Luca Guerra <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: LucaGuerra The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Perf diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - scap file
Benchmarks diff from master
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2200 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 75.19% 75.19%
=======================================
Files 261 261
Lines 33878 33878
Branches 5801 5801
=======================================
Hits 25475 25475
Misses 8403 8403
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
well yes of course this uses Oracle Linux Kernel which does not have headers available for debian 🤦 |
Yep that's why i used the other runners :D |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
Any specific area of the project related to this PR?
/area CI
Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?
No
What this PR does / why we need it:
Updating the runner should mean faster builds and hopefully tests not hanging.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: