-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move Aggregation Function Data Specs into the Query Runners #11192
Open
kevinwilfong
wants to merge
1
commit into
facebookincubator:main
Choose a base branch
from
kevinwilfong:export-D64011761
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+75
−61
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
label
Oct 7, 2024
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64011761 |
✅ Deploy Preview for meta-velox canceled.
|
kevinwilfong
pushed a commit
to kevinwilfong/velox
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2024
…incubator#11192) Summary: Aggregation Function Data Specs declare when we don't want to generate NaN/Infinity for the arguments to a particular aggregate. Today these are hard coded in the AggregationFuzzer itself, but whether or not we support NaN/Infinity in fuzzing an aggregate function is more tightly tied to what we are comparing against (in what cases it's compatible with Velox) which Fuzzer we're running (as evidenced by the fact the Presto and Spark Aggregation Fuzzers are using the same lists currently). We are seeing cases where fuzzing with the Presto Query Runner is succeeding while fuzzing with the DuckDB Query Runner is failing. To fix this I've moved the Aggregation Function Data Specs map into the Query Runner, so that we can specify per Query Runner in what aggregation functions we don't want to produce Nan/Infinity for. Differential Revision: D64011761
kevinwilfong
force-pushed
the
export-D64011761
branch
from
October 8, 2024 00:30
51ed855
to
bb6153b
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64011761 |
…incubator#11192) Summary: Aggregation Function Data Specs declare when we don't want to generate NaN/Infinity for the arguments to a particular aggregate. Today these are hard coded in the AggregationFuzzer itself, but whether or not we support NaN/Infinity in fuzzing an aggregate function is more tightly tied to what we are comparing against (in what cases it's compatible with Velox) which Fuzzer we're running (as evidenced by the fact the Presto and Spark Aggregation Fuzzers are using the same lists currently). We are seeing cases where fuzzing with the Presto Query Runner is succeeding while fuzzing with the DuckDB Query Runner is failing. To fix this I've moved the Aggregation Function Data Specs map into the Query Runner, so that we can specify per Query Runner in what aggregation functions we don't want to produce Nan/Infinity for. Differential Revision: D64011761
kevinwilfong
force-pushed
the
export-D64011761
branch
from
October 8, 2024 00:32
bb6153b
to
0759222
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64011761 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed
This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
fb-exported
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
Aggregation Function Data Specs declare when we don't want to generate NaN/Infinity for the arguments to a particular aggregate.
Today these are hard coded in the AggregationFuzzer itself, but whether or not we
support NaN/Infinity in fuzzing an aggregate function is more tightly tied to what we
are comparing against (in what cases it's compatible with Velox) which Fuzzer we're
running (as evidenced by the fact the Presto and Spark Aggregation Fuzzers are using
the same lists currently). We are seeing cases where fuzzing with the Presto Query
Runner is succeeding while fuzzing with the DuckDB Query Runner is failing.
To fix this I've moved the Aggregation Function Data Specs map into the Query
Runner, so that we can specify per Query Runner in what aggregation functions we
don't want to produce Nan/Infinity for.
Differential Revision: D64011761