Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix compilation error with OpenSSL 3 #9288

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Atry
Copy link
Contributor

@Atry Atry commented Nov 2, 2022

Summary:
In OpenSSL 3, EVP_PKEY_get0_* functions now return const pointers, breaking existing usage depending on mutable pointers returned by OpenSSL 1.x. This diff fix the errors

  1. Use auto type for return type of EVP_PKEY_get0_* functions instead of mutable pointer types.
  2. Some EVP_PKEY_get0_RSA are replaced with EVP_PKEY_get1_RSA in order to get a mutable pointer with the ownership.

See https://www.openssl.org/docs/man3.0/man7/crypto.html#LIBRARY-CONVENTIONS for the get_0 conventions

Differential Revision: D40942193

Summary:
In OpenSSL 3, `EVP_PKEY_get0_*` functions now return `const` pointers, breaking existing usage depending on mutable pointers returned by OpenSSL 1.x. This diff fix the errors

1. Use `auto` type for return type of `EVP_PKEY_get0_*` functions instead of mutable pointer types.
1. Some `EVP_PKEY_get0_RSA` are replaced with `EVP_PKEY_get1_RSA` in order to get a mutable pointer with the ownership.

See https://www.openssl.org/docs/man3.0/man7/crypto.html#LIBRARY-CONVENTIONS for the `get_0` conventions

Differential Revision: D40942193

fbshipit-source-id: b9a868aec3d332e9de323cb801af52e2692d4686
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D40942193

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Atry!

Thank you for your pull request.

We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and yours needs attention.

You currently have a record in our system, but the CLA is no longer valid, and will need to be resubmitted.

Process

In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.

Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants