-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix pending point extraction in gen_multi_from_multi #2914
Conversation
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64563496 |
Summary: Earlier today danielcohenlive was having trouble using gs and was getting a weird modeling error. Lena did some investigation an found we were using the wrong method to grab pending points from the experiment. See her notebook in the test plan for more details. to quote "Basically in some settings it’s not safe to deem a point pending based on the trial status; generally no point for which we have data, we want to consider pending" I just am putting up the fix with her logic here Differential Revision: D64563496
3dfeff5
to
ffb8b4b
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64563496 |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2914 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.67% 95.67%
=======================================
Files 502 502
Lines 49542 49542
=======================================
Hits 47400 47400
Misses 2142 2142 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Summary: Earlier today danielcohenlive was having trouble using gs and was getting a weird modeling error. Lena did some investigation an found we were using the wrong method to grab pending points from the experiment. See her notebook in the test plan for more details. to quote "Basically in some settings it’s not safe to deem a point pending based on the trial status; generally no point for which we have data, we want to consider pending" I just am putting up the fix with her logic here Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan, Cesar-Cardoso Differential Revision: D64563496
ffb8b4b
to
b8fc177
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64563496 |
Summary: Earlier today danielcohenlive was having trouble using gs and was getting a weird modeling error. Lena did some investigation an found we were using the wrong method to grab pending points from the experiment. See her notebook in the test plan for more details. to quote "Basically in some settings it’s not safe to deem a point pending based on the trial status; generally no point for which we have data, we want to consider pending" I just am putting up the fix with her logic here Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan, Cesar-Cardoso Differential Revision: D64563496
b8fc177
to
797f0ee
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64563496 |
This pull request has been merged in 9c362ab. |
Summary:
Earlier today danielcohenlive was having trouble using gs and was getting a weird modeling error. Lena did some investigation an found we were using the wrong method to grab pending points from the experiment. See her notebook in the test plan for more details. to quote "Basically in some settings it’s not safe to deem a point pending based on the trial status; generally no point for which we have data, we want to consider pending"
I just am putting up the fix with her logic here
Differential Revision: D64563496