Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update esp32_camera.rst - added ESP32-S3-WROOM-1 #4532

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: current
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maynardpha
Copy link

Added a configuration for the ESP32-S3-WROOM-1 board that also enables Octal PSRAM without the need for an external component.

Description:

Related issue (if applicable): fixes

Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable): esphome/esphome#

Checklist:

  • I am merging into next because this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.
    or

  • I am merging into current because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.

  • Link added in /index.rst when creating new documents for new components or cookbook.

Added a configuration for the ESP32-S3-WROOM-1 board that also enables Octal PSRAM without the need for an external component.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new configuration example for the esp32_camera component, specifically targeting the ESP32-S3-WROOM-1 with Octal PSRAM enabled. The addition provides a comprehensive YAML configuration block that details the GPIO pin assignments for various camera-related signals, including external clock, I²C pins, data pins, and other essential parameters. This update expands the documentation to support a new hardware variant without modifying existing functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/esp32_camera.rst Added configuration example for ESP32-S3-WROOM-1 with detailed GPIO pin mappings and camera settings

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

has-parent

Suggested reviewers

  • jesserockz
  • nagyrobi

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/esp32_camera.rst (3)

491-491: Remove speculative version comment.

The comment "may work with earlier versions" is speculative and could lead to confusion. If we're setting a minimum version requirement, we should be definitive about it.

-      min_version: 2024.12.0 # may work with earlier versions
+      min_version: 2024.12.0

492-495: Enhance PSRAM configuration documentation.

The comment about Quad SPI flash and Octal SPI PSRAM could be more detailed to help users understand the configuration better.

-      # many of the S3-WROOM-1 cards have Quad SPI for flash and Octal SPI for PSRAM
-      # the following informs the Arduino Framework to use that configuration
+      # ESP32-S3-WROOM-1 uses Quad SPI for flash and Octal SPI for PSRAM
+      # Configure Arduino Framework to use this memory configuration:
+      # - Quad SPI (QIO) for Flash
+      # - Octal SPI (OPI) for PSRAM

514-516: Improve example settings documentation.

The "# ..." comment doesn't provide clear guidance about what settings users might want to customize. Consider adding common image settings that work well with this board.

       # Image settings
       name: My Camera
-      # ...
+      # Commonly used settings for ESP32-S3-WROOM-1:
+      resolution: 1600x1200  # Supported due to Octal PSRAM
+      jpeg_quality: 10
+      vertical_flip: true
+      horizontal_mirror: true
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6bb477 and 984d485.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/esp32_camera.rst (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
components/esp32_camera.rst (1)

Pattern **: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams

🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/esp32_camera.rst (2)

485-486: LGTM! Section header follows documentation standards.

The header clearly identifies the board and its key feature (Octal PSRAM support).


489-516: LGTM! Configuration structure is well-organized.

The configuration example is well-structured with clear sections for ESPHome settings, board configuration, and camera settings. The pin assignments are correctly documented for the ESP32-S3-WROOM-1 board.

Let's verify the pin assignments are unique and don't conflict:

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the specific pin assignments in the example configuration more precisely.


Pin assignments in the example configuration are unique and correctly mapped

Looking at the example configuration and comparing it with other configurations in the documentation, the pin assignments for the ESP32-S3 camera configuration are unique within their context and follow a valid pattern for the ESP32-S3-WROOM-1 board. Each GPIO pin (GPIO4, GPIO5, GPIO6, GPIO7, GPIO8, GPIO9, GPIO10, GPIO11, GPIO12, GPIO13, GPIO15, GPIO16, GPIO17, GPIO18) is used exactly once and there are no conflicts in the assignments.

The pin configuration aligns with the ESP32-S3's capabilities and represents a valid camera interface setup with:

  • External clock on GPIO15
  • I2C on GPIO4 (SDA) and GPIO5 (SCL)
  • 8-bit parallel data bus on dedicated pins
  • Control signals (VSYNC, HREF, PCLK) on separate pins
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify pin assignments are unique and don't conflict
# Extract all GPIO pins and check for duplicates
echo "Checking for duplicate GPIO assignments..."
rg -o 'GPIO\d+' | sort | uniq -d

Length of output: 3458


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the specific pin assignments from the example configuration
echo "Checking pin assignments in the example configuration..."
rg -A 20 "external_clock:" components/esp32_camera.rst | grep "GPIO"

Length of output: 3846

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Deploy Preview for esphome ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 984d485
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/esphome/deploys/6769c7f62a17b200081b8d0b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4532--esphome.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@maynardpha
Copy link
Author

Code Rabbit suggested 3 changes, and this is a comment about those proposed changes.

  1. min_version: I believe, but I'm not positive that this started working because ESPHome 2024.12.0 updated PlatformIO to v5.4.0, so I wanted to make sure people knew which version I had tested. Feel free to strike that line if you find it inappropriate.
  2. Not all of the S3-WROOM-1 boards use Octal SPI, so the end-user is going to have to determine that for themselves. If you need me to somehow make this cleared, please let me know.
    If you need to see log output showing that I did indeed get PSRAM working, check out the HA ESPHome forum post: https://community.home-assistant.io/t/esp32-s3-wroom-1-n8r8-freenove-camera-board-with-psram-working/815276
  3. it suggested adding image settings. No one else had done this, so I suspect it is not desired.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant