CLN: Separate spec and bbox derivation #547
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mferrera
force-pushed
the
split-spec-bbox
branch
from
5bfee96
to
ef59ca4
Compare
This further breaks down the object data provider into a more refined API and into more maintainable and testable blocks. An added benefit is more type sanity.
mferrera
force-pushed
the
split-spec-bbox
branch
from
ef59ca4
to
9b16042
Compare
tnatt
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2024
|
Discussed the above comment and agreed to merge this as is 😄 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This further breaks down the object data provider into a more refined API and into more maintainable and testable blocks. An added benefit is more type sanity.
A next step is to move more of these
dict[str, Any]s (raa!) into more Pydantic... if warranted.