cached messages

[l3r8yJ]

closes #428

@h1alexbel take a look, please

---

PR-Codex overview

This PR focuses on improving the caching mechanism in the Timestamped and WithPartition classes.

Detailed summary

• Added imports for Scalar, Sticky, and Synced
• Changed the type of the message field in Timestamped and WithPartition to Scalar<ProducerRecord<K, X>>
• Updated the constructor of Timestamped and WithPartition to use Synced and Sticky for caching
• Added a todo comment to write tests for the caching mechanism in both classes

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

[zoeself]

@l3r8yJ thank you for your Pull Request. I'll assign someone to review it soon.

If this PR solves a todo from the code, please don't forget to remove it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (5159a40) 99.00% compared to head (023fbe8) 99.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #429   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     99.00%   99.00%           
  Complexity      173      173           
=========================================
  Files            82       82           
  Lines           504      504           
  Branches          1        1           
=========================================
  Hits            499      499           
  Misses            5        5           

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
.../java/io/github/eocqrs/kafka/xml/XmlMapParams.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../java/io/github/eocqrs/kafka/data/Timestamped.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ava/io/github/eocqrs/kafka/data/WithPartition.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[zoeself]

@h1alexbel please review this Pull Request. Deadline (when it should be merged or closed) is 2023-08-23T17:59:09.750988.

You should check if the requirements have been implemented (partially or in full), if there are unit tests covering the changes and if the CI build passes. Feel free to reject the PR or ask for changes if it's too big or not clear enough.

Estimation here is 30 minutes, that's how much you will be paid. You will be paid even if this PR gets rejected.

[h1alexbel]

@l3r8yJ can we introduce any tests on this?

[l3r8yJ]

@h1alexbel I'll create a puzzle

[l3r8yJ]

@h1alexbel take a look, please

[zoeself]

@h1alexbel Don't forget to close this ticket before the deadline (2023-08-23T17:59:10). You are past the first half of the allowed period.

[h1alexbel]

@l3r8yJ Overall looks good, but also, I have a few questions

[h1alexbel]

@l3r8yJ why we are doing Sync here?

[l3r8yJ]

@h1alexbel Due to the fact that Sticky is not thread-safe by default

[h1alexbel]

@rultor merge

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@h1alexbel OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@h1alexbel Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 2min)

[h1alexbel]

@l3r8yJ thanks

[zoeself]

@h1alexbel thank you for resolving this ticket. I've just added it to your active invoice. You can always check all your invoices and more on the Contributor Dashboard.