-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
build: clean up deps #180
build: clean up deps #180
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have skipped reviewing this pull request. We don't currently review these file types ['.lock', '.toml'] - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #180 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.21% 98.21%
=======================================
Files 8 8
Lines 559 559
=======================================
Hits 549 549
Misses 10 10
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. Just two small issues:
- Can you please sort the deps in alphanumerical order in each section? It's easy to miss a dependency that's already in there.
- I think you can remove
kubernetes
from the test deps, as it's already in the app dependencies (as I think you already mentioned you would in your PR description).
Also please note that |
Description
Useless dependency group
dev
, this would just make it harder to maintain versions.Note: Removed
k8s
from test deps group, it should be obv that to test,tesk
should be installed :)