-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adr-0036: Add as benefit the use of externalTrafficPolicy=local #978
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this small, but important addition.
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ Chosen options: 1 & 3 & 5 | |||
- No changes are needed. | |||
- More resources are available on the AMS nodes. | |||
- Reduce complexity. | |||
- We will now use `externalTrafficPolicy: local` and with this we will reduce latency and preserve the client’s source IP address, which is essential for some applications that rely on knowing the client's IP, such as for logging, security, or geolocation services. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you think of moving it to Recommendation to Platform Administrators
and reword it a little bit?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If not I would say that we should reword it to something along the lines of
externalTrafficPolicy
can be set tolocal
which can reduce latency and preserve the client's source IP.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We decided to have it by default set to local
so the can be se to 'local' ...
sounds a bit strange since we did this by default now in apps #2317
What is your thought on this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It sounds like more of an action than a positive consequence of the chosen option(s), but I'm not too bothered. Merge if you are happy.
Quality gates: