Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update scaling-on-kubernetes.asciidoc #977

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2024
Merged

Update scaling-on-kubernetes.asciidoc #977

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2024

Conversation

amitkanfer
Copy link
Contributor

Adjusting the example to fit a more high-scale deployment, it's also aligned with the first row in the following table

Adjusting the example to fit a more high-scale deployment, it's also aligned with the first row in the following table
@amitkanfer amitkanfer requested a review from a team as a code owner March 14, 2024 14:30
Copy link

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Mar 14, 2024

This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @amitkanfer? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-/d./d is the label to automatically backport to the /d./d branch. /d is the digit
    NOTE: backport-skip has been added to this pull request.

@strawgate
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@kilfoyle kilfoyle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks a lot Amit!
I'll merge it after CI checks pass.

@kilfoyle kilfoyle merged commit b892ced into main Mar 14, 2024
4 checks passed
@kilfoyle
Copy link
Contributor

💚 All backports created successfully

Status Branch Result
8.13

Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI.

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

kilfoyle pushed a commit to kilfoyle/ingest-docs that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
Adjusting the example to fit a more high-scale deployment, it's also aligned with the first row in the following table

(cherry picked from commit b892ced)
@kilfoyle
Copy link
Contributor

💚 All backports created successfully

Status Branch Result
8.12

Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI.

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

kilfoyle pushed a commit to kilfoyle/ingest-docs that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
Adjusting the example to fit a more high-scale deployment, it's also aligned with the first row in the following table

(cherry picked from commit b892ced)
kilfoyle added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
Adjusting the example to fit a more high-scale deployment, it's also aligned with the first row in the following table

(cherry picked from commit b892ced)

Co-authored-by: Amit Kanfer <[email protected]>
kilfoyle added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
Adjusting the example to fit a more high-scale deployment, it's also aligned with the first row in the following table

(cherry picked from commit b892ced)

Co-authored-by: Amit Kanfer <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants