-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: patch runSchedule on application.unittest.ts #63
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@fengmk2 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 56 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the application's scheduling mechanism. The Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/app/extend/application.unittest.ts (2)
52-54
: Simplify return statements by removing unnecessary 'await'In an async function,
return await
is redundant because the function will automatically await the result. Removing the unnecessaryawait
can simplify the code and improve readability.Apply this diff to simplify the return statements:
-return await this.ctxStorage.run(ctx, async () => { - return await schedule.task(ctx, ...args); -}); +return this.ctxStorage.run(ctx, () => schedule.task(ctx, ...args));
56-56
: Avoid using 'as any' to preserve type safetyUsing
as any
disables TypeScript's type checking for the exported object, which can mask potential type errors and reduces the benefits of TypeScript. Consider properly typing the exported object to maintain type safety.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/app.ts
(1 hunks)src/app/extend/application.unittest.ts
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/app.ts (1)
5-5
: LGTM!
The import statement for EggScheduleJobInfo
is correctly added and necessary for the updated code.
[skip ci] ## [5.0.1](v5.0.0...v5.0.1) (2024-12-17) ### Bug Fixes * patch runSchedule on application.unittest.ts ([#63](#63)) ([cc9488c](cc9488c))
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
runSchedule
function to simplify the application code and eliminate redundancy.Refactor
didLoad
toconfigDidLoad
in theBoot
class for clarity and consistency.