Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update requirements #24

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024
Merged

chore: update requirements #24

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

MoisesGSalas
Copy link
Member

This updates the normal requirements.

Additionally we remove the pin in the codejail library. We should instead keep it in sync with edx-platform.

@MoisesGSalas MoisesGSalas requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2024 22:46
requirements/base.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
strategy:
matrix:
python-version: ["3.8", "3.11", "3.12"]
python-version: ["3.11", "3.12"]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since we're dropping the tests for Python 3.8, and we can no longer guarantee compatibility with Quince, should we bump the version, add an entry to the changelog, and update the compatibility table?

Copy link
Contributor

@mariajgrimaldi mariajgrimaldi Oct 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This plugin follows the tutor versioning convention, so this version (v17.x.x) doesn't necessarily support quince, although no significant changes have been made for a while. This makes me question if this plugin (edit: service) should follow the same convention that demands a new version each release cause we've been using the same for a while.

Now that Maga mentioned the compatibility table, can we update it to reflect the current plugin (edit: service) state?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reminder that this is not a Tutor plugin, this is essentially an IDA, tutor-contrib-codejail is the one that follows the Tutor versioning scheme. The actual plugin uses the compatible code of codejailservice for each release.

We decided to change the versioning scheme in redwood (see: #22). What should happen is that a new sumac branch is created, tutor-contrib-codejail builds using that branch until the release is ready and after that we tag sumac.1. I don't think the compatibility table in this repo is useful and I would rather remove it.

One thing that can be improved though, we should tag the other point-releases when they are ready.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, sorry. I edited my comment so it references the service instead.

I wasn't aware of the change in the versioning scheme. Should we remove the service releases to make it less confusing?

Copy link
Contributor

@mariajgrimaldi mariajgrimaldi Oct 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it makes sense, we can leave them up for history reasons, but it'd be good to drop the compatibility table that reference that release convention.

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
strategy:
matrix:
python-version: ["3.8", "3.11", "3.12"]
python-version: ["3.11", "3.12"]
Copy link
Contributor

@mariajgrimaldi mariajgrimaldi Oct 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This plugin follows the tutor versioning convention, so this version (v17.x.x) doesn't necessarily support quince, although no significant changes have been made for a while. This makes me question if this plugin (edit: service) should follow the same convention that demands a new version each release cause we've been using the same for a while.

Now that Maga mentioned the compatibility table, can we update it to reflect the current plugin (edit: service) state?

requirements/constraints.txt Show resolved Hide resolved
In addition to updating the requirements we also removed the pin to the
codejail library. We also remove support/testing for python3.8
@MoisesGSalas MoisesGSalas merged commit fc86fc9 into main Oct 24, 2024
4 checks passed
@MoisesGSalas MoisesGSalas deleted the mgs/update-requirements branch October 24, 2024 21:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants