Lua bindings

[dedok]

Issue: #392

Also, when this PR is approved, I'll post some information about this event in lua, luajit, tarantool mailings.

[arfoll]

I'm kind of confused why all these are needed, if you use a build/ directory then everything will get ignored. Let's keep this stuff out unless there's a good reason

[dedok]

i do not use build/ directory :)
Okay if you don't like these changes I can remove them out.

[arfoll]

building in tree is not recommended for cmake (or any other builds really tbh), any good reason why you can't just build somewhere outside of git or simply add an ignore for your build directory? In any case such stuff doesn't belong in commits adding Lua support so please remove.

[arfoll]

So this is very cool, thanks. I'm worried there's alot of docs duplication, do the docs build? Also can you rebase all the patches into one and add a sign-off as mentioned in CONTRIBUTING.MD.

Note, do the gpio interupts work? Any plans to support them?

[dedok]

Note, do the gpio interupts work?

Only AIO, GPIO's read_, write_ is tested.

Any plans to support them?

If some thing does not work I'll fix this. Currently I do not test all features since I need only GPIO read, write and AIO. But in the future my projects will need more MRAA features.
Also where is big chance that somebody from Lua, LuaJit community can help MRAA.

[dedok]

So this is very cool, thanks. I'm worried there's alot of docs duplication, do the docs build?

Yes I did and I got few warnings, I do not have big knowledge in sphx docs :)

Also can you rebase all the patches into one and add a sign-off as mentioned in CONTRIBUTING.MD.

Only tomorrow.

[dedok]

I found some issues in docs - I trying to resolve them.
@arfoll You don't mind if I'll add full information about Lua in docs/lua.md and remove src/lua/docs?

[Hbrinj]

Hows this going Dedok?

[dedok]

@Hbrinj Hi, in progress...
I'll prepare new PR, this one is out of date :)
I have already use this bindings and I have found some bugs, those bugs were fixed by me. But I didn't prepare the documentation for Lua API yet. Is this critical for you?

[Hbrinj]

No it's not critical just wanted to see if things were going well :)

Sent from my iPhone

On 2 Aug 2016, at 20:29, Vasiliy Soshnikov [email protected] wrote:

@Hbrinj Hi, in progress...
I'll prepare new PR, this one is out of date :)
I have already use this bindings and I have found some bugs, those bugs were fixed by me. But I didn't prepare the documentation for Lua API yet. Is this critical for you?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[arfoll]

Any news on this? I'd love to merge an updated version of it

[drasko]

Can somebody please merge this one? It's been here for months, and it is super-useful feature.

[dedok]

Sorry I forgot about it. I have to revert all changes in docs generating and merge changes from my fork after that it could be merged. Current, this fork have few bugs. Please give me more time.

[alext-mkrs]

@dedok, so do you still plan to get this one updated?