-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
[test] add Test for expand of invisible TreeItem #901 #933
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Test Results 299 files ±0 299 suites ±0 5m 32s ⏱️ -35s For more details on these failures, see this check. Results for commit 985f5ea. ± Comparison against base commit bb3af98. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
|
@basilevs : where do you see it, link? |
|
That JUnitTestRunnerInterceptor was introduced with eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator#1630 Does it only make problem with swt? @akurtakov |
I think what's missing is a dependency to this one being added in the surefire configuration (dependency tag), otherwise it would simply not be downloaded in builds and thus fail that way. TBH, I'm not 100% sure this is the correct way to support parametrized tests but as I don't have the time to investigate it further I don't want to spoil the party. |
1086adf
to
bbf4ec6
Compare
@SyntevoAlex here is a reproducer you asked for:
|
Unfortunately my queue is more that full currently. |
@jukzi you might want to learn how to debug native code. I could give a few hints. |
i would love to if i had the time - same issue here, i can't become expert in every field. |
bbf4ec6
to
985f5ea
Compare
i close this PR as there is currently not enough resources on SWT to fix the behaviour |
fails on GTK
eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.ui#1331 (comment)