Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency pycryptodomex to v3.19.1 [SECURITY] #35

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 6, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pycryptodomex (source, changelog) ==3.18.0 -> ==3.19.1 age adoption passing confidence

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2023-52323

PyCryptodome and pycryptodomex before 3.19.1 allow side-channel leakage for OAEP decryption, exploitable for a Manger attack.


Release Notes

Legrandin/pycryptodome (pycryptodomex)

v3.19.1: - Zeil

Compare Source

Resolved issues

  • Fixed a side-channel leakage with OAEP decryption that could be
    exploited to carry out a Manger attack. Thanks to Hubert Kario.

v3.19.0: - Ulm

Compare Source

New features

  • The update() methods of TupleHash128 and TupleHash256 objects
    can now hash multiple items (byte strings) at once.
    Thanks to Sylvain Pelissier.
  • Added support for ECDH, with Crypto.Protocol.DH.

Resolved issues

  • GH#754: due to a bug in cffi, do not use it on Windows with Python 3.12+.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants