Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolve naming inconsistencies #1692

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 28, 2023
Merged

Resolve naming inconsistencies #1692

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 28, 2023

Conversation

Bunn
Copy link
Collaborator

@Bunn Bunn commented Sep 28, 2023

Task/Issue URL: https://app.asana.com/0/1204167627774280/1205568633568787/f

Description:
Resolve naming inconsistencies between backend and client side

Steps to test this PR:

  1. Test endpoint for redeem
  2. Test endpoint for solving captcha

@Bunn Bunn merged commit ee02695 into develop Sep 28, 2023
@Bunn Bunn deleted the bunn/naming-inconsistencies branch September 28, 2023 18:16
samsymons added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2023
…-remote-fetching

# By Alexey Martemyanov (1) and others
# Via GitHub
* develop:
  Add scan and optout support for child sites (#1681)
  Connection interruption simulation option (#1686)
  Resolve naming inconsistencies (#1692)
  Improve Asana integration for failed PR checks (#1673)
  Favicon store refactoring (#1674)
  Update BSK with autofill 8.4.1 (#1687)

# Conflicts:
#	DuckDuckGo/NetworkProtection/AppTargets/BothAppTargets/NetworkProtectionAppEvents.swift
samsymons added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
…-pixels

* develop:
  Update Sparkle to 2.5.0 (#1645)
  Opt-out pixels improvements (#1694)
  Run DBP tests on the CI (#1682)
  Fix for Autofill sections not sorting correctly (#1677)
  Add scan and optout support for child sites (#1681)
  Connection interruption simulation option (#1686)
  Resolve naming inconsistencies (#1692)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants