Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/9.0] Update dependencies from dotnet/emsdk #107917

Conversation

dotnet-maestro[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot commented Sep 17, 2024

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/emsdk

  • Subscription: f85f62c8-5e7d-4706-1003-08dcbc30275f
  • Build: 20240919.1
  • Date Produced: September 20, 2024 6:37:43 AM UTC
  • Commit: 8e660ff41e91879977e3a9d837e068bd72234c26
  • Branch: refs/heads/release/9.0

…16.6

Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.emsdk , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100.Transport
 From Version 9.0.0-rc.2.24464.3 -> To Version 9.0.0-rtm.24466.6
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow label Sep 17, 2024
@carlossanlop carlossanlop added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 17, 2024
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

@lewing there are new emscripten failures, can you please take a look?

@lewing lewing removed the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 17, 2024
@carlossanlop carlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release labels Sep 17, 2024
@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Sep 17, 2024

This needs fixes for the stable package name

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Sep 17, 2024

need #106881 to take this

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Sep 18, 2024

I this this should resolve if darc runs again and adds the stable feed. I will check tomorrow.

…17.4

Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.emsdk , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100 , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100.Transport
 From Version 9.0.0-rtm.24466.6 -> To Version 9.0.0-rtm.24467.4
@mmitche
Copy link
Member

mmitche commented Sep 18, 2024

@lewing We usually don't set repos to stable until mid October to reduce the verification burden. I think we should turn that off in emsdk for now.

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Sep 18, 2024

@lewing We usually don't set repos to stable until mid October to reduce the verification burden. I think we should turn that off in emsdk for now.

yeah I think it was done in error, will undo it

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Sep 18, 2024

@mmitche dotnet/emsdk#939

@lewing lewing removed the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 18, 2024
@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Sep 18, 2024

now we get to resolve this the hard way, see discussion at dotnet/sdk#43554

@lewing lewing added the NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) label Sep 18, 2024
Copy link
Member

@lewing lewing left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs new flow and the linked prs

…19.1

Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.emsdk , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100 , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100.Transport
 From Version 9.0.0-rtm.24467.4 -> To Version 9.0.0-rtm.24469.1
@lewing lewing closed this Sep 21, 2024
@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot deleted the darc-release/9.0-c0f6ebe5-94b4-4015-a2c9-736bb516d80c branch September 21, 2024 02:16
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 22, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants