Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump slot to 0.14.1 #2432

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2024
Merged

Bump slot to 0.14.1 #2432

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

kariy
Copy link
Member

@kariy kariy commented Sep 16, 2024

update to the new default Controller session expiry time cartridge-gg/slot#89

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Upgraded the slot library to version v0.14.1, potentially enhancing performance and introducing new features.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Included various bug fixes from the updated slot library version.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Walkthrough

Ohayo, sensei! The pull request involves an update to the Cargo.toml file, specifically changing the version of the slot dependency from v0.14.0 to v0.14.1. This change indicates an upgrade to the slot library, potentially incorporating various improvements or fixes. The other dependencies listed in the file remain unchanged, highlighting that the primary focus of this update is solely on the slot library.

Changes

File Change Summary
Cargo.toml Updated slot dependency version from v0.14.0 to v0.14.1

Sequence Diagram(s)

(No sequence diagrams are generated as the changes are straightforward and do not involve modifications to control flow or new features.)


Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 069bc1a and bcdaa4c.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (1)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
Cargo.toml (1)

230-230: Ohayo sensei! The version bump for the slot dependency looks good.

The change aligns with the PR objective. Since it's a minor version bump, it's unlikely to introduce breaking changes. However, I recommend the following:

  • Thoroughly test the integration to ensure compatibility with the new version.
  • Review the changelog or release notes of the slot library to understand the specific changes and improvements in v0.14.1.
  • If there are any critical fixes or relevant changes in v0.14.1, consider highlighting them in the PR description.

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.88%. Comparing base (069bc1a) to head (bcdaa4c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2432      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.89%   67.88%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         364      364              
  Lines       47927    47927              
==========================================
- Hits        32539    32535       -4     
- Misses      15388    15392       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kariy kariy merged commit a96c4c9 into main Sep 16, 2024
15 checks passed
@kariy kariy deleted the bump-slot branch September 16, 2024 15:50
@kariy kariy mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant