Update installation.md #1899
Merged
Update installation.md #1899
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
just changed the spelling error in point 3 from "exisint" to "existing", but I suppose "existent" could work as well
✅ Deploy Preview for dlt-hub-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
burnash
approved these changes
Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
I changed the spelling error in point 3 from "exisint" to "existing", but I suppose "existent" could work as well.
previously, read as:
# install the newest dlt version or upgrade the exisint version to the newest oneto
# install the newest dlt version or upgrade the existing version to the newest oneRelated Issues
no related issues (yet...)
Additional Context
it's an overly simple one but I did check the rest of the page for additional spelling errors and did not find any, spelling or grammatical or otherwise. (I also didn't run the tests locally because it only related to spelling of text for a code comment in an example)