Skip to content

Mention .tupleof as a data-member only alternative to allMembers #4169

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Mention .tupleof as a data-member only alternative to allMembers #4169

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions spec/traits.dd
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1872,6 +1872,9 @@ void main()
$(P The order in which the strings appear in the result
is not defined.)

$(P `WARNING:` If you're trying to iterate only data members,
use the builtin property .tupleof instead.)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO this only applies to structs. With classes, .tupleof does not take fields from the base class into account according to the spec.


$(H3 $(GNAME derivedMembers))

$(P Takes a single argument, which must evaluate to either
Expand Down