FIX: Fixed indentation problem (RST) in w9 blogpost

posts/2024/2024_07_26_Inigo_week_9.rst

@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ After discussing with my mentors, we decided to take two steps:
 
 1. Validate reliably whether the conditioning is working or not. For this, there are two strategies:
     - Checking that the predicted conditioning variable matches the input. In other words, measuring the MSE between the "true age" VS the "predicted age", their correlation, and plotting one against the other. This way you know how good the encoder is capturing the conditioning variable variation in the training data. The authors of the paper I based my implementation on do it like this:
+
     .. image:: /_static/images/gsoc/2024/inigo/conditioning_validation_using_mse.png
         :alt: Scatter plot of true vs predicted conditioning variable for validation.
         :width: 600