Part 2: propogate transform in visit_scan_files

[nicklan]

Stacked PR: Only review these commits

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Propagate the computed transforms from #607 through calls to visit_scan_files.

Just a draft to allow seeing where this will go. Probably needs tests (although all existing tests pass).

How was this change tested?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.87037% with 37 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.45%. Comparing base (ba37b62) to head (da29cc7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
kernel/src/scan/log_replay.rs	85.71%	7 Missing and 11 partials ⚠️
ffi/src/scan.rs	0.00%	16 Missing ⚠️
kernel/src/scan/mod.rs	95.31%	0 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #612      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.43%   83.45%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          75       75              
  Lines       16922    17115     +193     
  Branches    16922    17115     +193     
==========================================
+ Hits        14119    14284     +165     
- Misses       2146     2164      +18     
- Partials      657      667      +10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[scovich]

Just double checking -- this PR makes almost no functional changes (other than printing the transforms)? It's mostly wiring to prepare for the next PR?

[scovich]

Suggested change

	// /// allow probing into a CStringMap. If the specified key is in the map, kernel will call
	// /// allow probing into a CTransformMap. If the specified key is in the map, kernel will call

(tho probably this whole chunk of code should just be moved to the later FFI PR?)

[nicklan]

Just double checking -- this PR makes almost no functional changes (other than printing the transforms)? It's mostly wiring to prepare for the next PR?

Yep, that's right. Just keeping things in logical chunks as much as possible. Hopefully that made the reviews easier