DLPX-92534 linux-pkg changes for LTS upgrade to 24.04 #325
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
palash-gandhi
force-pushed
the
dlpx/pr/palash-gandhi/545afa70-4102-4fa9-bd91-b5d72eb35fd5
branch
3 times, most recently
from
8afa695 to
e678599
Compare
palash-gandhi
changed the title
jwk404
approved these changes
Oct 3, 2024
palash-gandhi
force-pushed
the
dlpx/pr/palash-gandhi/545afa70-4102-4fa9-bd91-b5d72eb35fd5
branch
2 times, most recently
from
9974ef3 to
499fcc5
Compare
palash-gandhi
force-pushed
the
dlpx/pr/palash-gandhi/545afa70-4102-4fa9-bd91-b5d72eb35fd5
branch
2 times, most recently
from
751fb09 to
8fa2fda
Compare
palash-gandhi
changed the title
palash-gandhi
force-pushed
the
dlpx/pr/palash-gandhi/545afa70-4102-4fa9-bd91-b5d72eb35fd5
branch
from
8fa2fda to
22b3e97
Compare
palash-gandhi
changed the title
palash-gandhi
force-pushed
the
dlpx/pr/palash-gandhi/545afa70-4102-4fa9-bd91-b5d72eb35fd5
branch
11 times, most recently
from
254e4ee to
dde565b
Compare
palash-gandhi
changed the title
can you clarify why it's OK to remove the adoptopenjdk package? why did we need it to begin with? |
From https://perforce.slack.com/archives/C07HB5Y7K8S/p1729097131001349, it sounds like it was an old process that we stuck to and there's no reason to maintain a copy of the package in artifactory. |
|
Thanks, OK.. I'd defer to Seb, so if he's OK with it, then seems reasonable to me.. perhaps when we started down that path, there wasn't a JDK 8 available from ubuntu.. |
palash-gandhi
force-pushed
the
dlpx/pr/palash-gandhi/545afa70-4102-4fa9-bd91-b5d72eb35fd5
branch
10 times, most recently
from
39ba085 to
dd1b9fc
Compare
palash-gandhi
force-pushed
the
dlpx/pr/palash-gandhi/545afa70-4102-4fa9-bd91-b5d72eb35fd5
branch
from
dd1b9fc to
cea9bac
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
This PR contains changes required for the Ubuntu LTS upgrade to 24.04 and as such targets the
os-upgradebranch. It mainly removes a few internal sources in favor of upstream packages and also enables building the remaining packages on 24.04.Solution
The following are the changes, along with explanations for each:
adoptopenjdk: Prior to this PR, the JDK was sourced and downloaded from our internal artifactory. There is no reason why we cannot install this via apt.bpftrace,bcc,drgn,fio,gdb-python,libkdumpfileandmold: All of these packages also can be sourced directly from their respective upstream sources (dependent changes WIP)llvm-12is not available on 24.04. As such updateconnstatandzfs's build dependency to depend onllvm-14instead.zfsalso requires additional packages:dh-dkmslibpam0g: The bootstrap image that the current + future OS upgrade projects will initially use is based on a vanilla Ubuntu image, and not a Delphix-based buildserver. Hence, the PAM headers need to be installed as a build dependency of ZFSlibtirpc-devTesting Done
WIP