Skip to content
forked from cfzd/FcaNet

FcaNet: Frequency Channel Attention Networks

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

dcdcvgroup/FcaNet

 
 

Repository files navigation

FcaNet: Frequency Channel Attention Networks

PyTorch implementation of the paper "FcaNet: Frequency Channel Attention Networks".

alt text

Simplest usage

Models pretrained on ImageNet can be simply accessed by (without any configuration or installation):

model = torch.hub.load('cfzd/FcaNet', 'fca34' ,pretrained=True)
model = torch.hub.load('cfzd/FcaNet', 'fca50' ,pretrained=True)
model = torch.hub.load('cfzd/FcaNet', 'fca101' ,pretrained=True)
model = torch.hub.load('cfzd/FcaNet', 'fca152' ,pretrained=True)

Install

Please see INSTALL.md

Models

Classification models on ImageNet

Due to the conversion between FP16 training and the provided FP32 models, the evaluation results are slightly different(max -0.06%/+0.05%) compared with the reported results.

Model Reported Evaluation Results Link
FcaNet34 75.07 75.02 GoogleDrive/BaiduDrive(code:m7v8)
FcaNet50 78.52 78.57 GoogleDrive/BaiduDrive(code:mgkk)
FcaNet101 79.64 79.63 GoogleDrive/BaiduDrive(code:8t0j)
FcaNet152 80.08 80.02 GoogleDrive/BaiduDrive(code:5yeq)

Detection and instance segmentation models on COCO

Model Backbone AP AP50 AP75 Link
Faster RCNN FcaNet50 39.0 61.1 42.3 GoogleDrive/BaiduDrive(code:q15c)
Faster RCNN FcaNet101 41.2 63.3 44.6 GoogleDrive/BaiduDrive(code:pgnx)
Mask RCNN Fca50 det
Fca50 seg
40.3
36.2
62.0
58.6
44.1
38.1
GoogleDrive/BaiduDrive(code:d9rn)

Training

Please see launch_training_classification.sh and launch_training_detection.sh for training on ImageNet and COCO, respectively.

Testing

Please see launch_eval_classification.sh and launch_eval_detection.sh for testing on ImageNet and COCO, respectively.

FAQ

Since the paper is uploaded to arxiv, many academic peers ask us: the proposed DCT basis can be viewed as a simple tensor, then how about learning the tensor directly? Why use DCT instead of learnable tensor? Learnable tensor can be better than DCT.

Our concrete answer is: the proposed DCT is better than the learnable way, although it is counter-intuitive.

Method ImageNet Top-1 Acc Link
Learnable tensor, random initialization 77.914 GoogleDrive/BaiduDrive(code:p2hl)
Learnable tensor, DCT initialization 78.352 GoogleDrive/BaiduDrive(code:txje)
Fixed tensor, random initialization 77.742 GoogleDrive/BaiduDrive(code:g5t9)
Fixed tensor, DCT initialization (Ours) 78.574 GoogleDrive/BaiduDrive(code:mgkk)

To verify this results, one can select the cooresponding types of tensor in the L73-L83 in model/layer.py, uncomment it and train the whole network.

TODO

  • Object detection models
  • Instance segmentation models
  • Fix the incorrect results of detection models
  • Make the switching between configs more easier

About

FcaNet: Frequency Channel Attention Networks

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Python 99.7%
  • Other 0.3%