Fix config example for dbt_project.yml

[dbeatty10]

Previews

• Semantic models

What are you changing in this pull request and why?

Within dbt_project.yml, resource types have dashes (-) instead of underscores (_), so we need to update this code example accordingly.

Backstory

Within the description for #4180, I added some examples of what I guessed the syntax would be, but I didn't specify that these were completely unverified guesses 😬.

This particular example got missed during #4281.

🎩

Checklist

• Review the Content style guide and About versioning so my content adheres to these guidelines.
• I have verified that the code examples work
• I have checked that the preview renders correctly

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
docs-getdbt-com	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Nov 15, 2023 11:18pm

[mirnawong1]

lgtm @dbeatty10 ! though i put the yaml through a validator and it said the meta contents should look like:

semantic-models:
  my_project_name:
    +enabled: true | false
    +group: some_group
    +meta:
      some_key: some_value

[dbeatty10]

lgtm @dbeatty10 ! though i put the yaml through a validator and it said the meta contents should look like:

semantic-models:
  my_project_name:
    +enabled: true | false
    +group: some_group
    +meta:
      some_key: some_value

Good idea @mirnawong1 ! I'll make that switch.

More detail

The general format is:

semantic-models:
  <resource-path>:
    +enabled: true | false
    +group: <group_name>
    +meta: {<dictionary>}

Either of these will achieve the same end result:

semantic-models:
  my_project_name:
    +enabled: true | false
    +group: some_group
    +meta:
      some_key: some_value

or

semantic-models:
  my_project_name:
    +enabled: true | false
    +group: some_group
    +meta: {"some_key": "some_value"}

But the syntax you mentioned is more readable and writeable, so it would be best for the code examples.

Thanks for noticing and putting it through the validator 💡