Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adap 1049/lazy load agate #1050

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

Adap 1049/lazy load agate #1050

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 14, 2024

Conversation

VersusFacit
Copy link
Contributor

resolves #1049

Problem

Let's lazy load Agate and make it available for type checking.

Solution

Propagates the lazy load paradigm from other adapter PRs.

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
  • I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
  • This PR has no interface changes (e.g. macros, cli, logs, json artifacts, config files, adapter interface, etc) or this PR has already received feedback and approval from Product or DX

@VersusFacit VersusFacit self-assigned this Jun 13, 2024
@VersusFacit VersusFacit requested a review from a team as a code owner June 13, 2024 03:00
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label Jun 13, 2024
@VersusFacit VersusFacit merged commit 7850da3 into main Jun 14, 2024
20 checks passed
@VersusFacit VersusFacit deleted the ADAP-1049/lazy_load_agate branch June 14, 2024 05:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@colin-rogers-dbt colin-rogers-dbt colin-rogers-dbt approved these changes

Assignees

@VersusFacit VersusFacit

Labels
cla:yes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature] Lazy load agate
2 participants
@VersusFacit @colin-rogers-dbt